2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10452-019-09682-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zooplankton functional-approach studies in continental aquatic environments: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barnett et al (2007) compiled literature information on microcrustacean traits, and pointed out a lot of missing data on traits such as food size range, stoichiometric ratios and food selectivity. More recent compilations still point out gaps on functional traits (Hébert et al 2016a;Gomes et al 2019). Here, we summarized information available on response and effect traits for cladocerans and copepods.…”
Section: Gaps and Constraints Of Zooplankton Functional Trait Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Barnett et al (2007) compiled literature information on microcrustacean traits, and pointed out a lot of missing data on traits such as food size range, stoichiometric ratios and food selectivity. More recent compilations still point out gaps on functional traits (Hébert et al 2016a;Gomes et al 2019). Here, we summarized information available on response and effect traits for cladocerans and copepods.…”
Section: Gaps and Constraints Of Zooplankton Functional Trait Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent functional studies, including the functional groups, use mostly qualitative traits, such as feeding type, trophic group, and habitat. Body size is usually the only quantitative trait included (Gomes et al 2019). That is way, it is easier to find trait values for all species, because these qualitative traits are phylogenetically conservative, i.e., they are the same for all species in a genus or family.…”
Section: Gaps and Constraints Of Zooplankton Functional Trait Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the recent increase in studies considering the functional approach, for zooplankton there are still some gaps to be explored. The first one is the difficulty of measuring the functional traits in small organisms (Martiny et al 2013), which has been a barrier lasting decades and has only recently aroused the interest of ecologists once again (Hortal et al 2015, Gomes et al 2019. The second gap is related to the incipient knowledge of zooplankton in many unexplored ecosystems, due to the higher concentration of studies in a few regions of the world (Schwind et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second gap is related to the incipient knowledge of zooplankton in many unexplored ecosystems, due to the higher concentration of studies in a few regions of the world (Schwind et al 2013). Finally, there is a gap in knowledge on the effects of zooplankton functional traits on the ecosystems, as most studies focus on the organisms response traits, which can be structured as results of ecosystem variations (Rosado et al 2016, Gomes et al 2019. Thus, the poor knowledge on zooplankton functional traits is a limiting factor to develop this kind of study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A species, or group of species, may appear to be functionally redundant under one set of environmental conditions, but may differ in their effect on ecosystem processes under a different set of environmental conditions [8]. The Rotifers and crustacean species are suggested as indicators that can be used to identify different physical and chemical gradients or eutrophic increases in freshwater ecosystem [9]. They are highly sensitive to physico-chemical and biological changes of water quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%