SUMMARY1. Positron emission tomographic imaging of brain blood flow was used to identify areas of motor activation associated with volitional inspiration in six normal male subjects.2. Scans were performed using intravenous infusion of H2150 during voluntary targeted breathing and positive pressure passive ventilation at the same level.3. Regional increases in brain blood flow, due to active inspiration, were derived using a pixel by pixel comparison of images obtained during the voluntary and passive ventilation phases.4. Pooling data from all subjects revealed statistically significant increases in blood flow bilaterally in the primary motor cortex (left, 54%; right, 4 3%), in the right pre-motor cortex (7-6 %), in the supplementary motor area (SMA; 341 %) and in the cerebellum (4-9%).5. The site of increased neural activation in the motor cortex, associated with volitional inspiration, is consistent with an area which when stimulated, either directly during neurosurgery or transcranially with a magnetic stimulus, results in activation of the diaphragm.6. The presence of additional sites of neural activation in the pre-motor cortex and SMA appears analogous to the results of studies on voluntary limb movement. The site of the increase in the SMA was posterior to that previously reported for arm movements. These areas are believed to have a role 'upstream ' of the motor cortex in the planning and organization of movement.7. This technique provides a means of studying the volitional motor control of respiratory related tasks in man.

SUMMARY1. Positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), using a new 3-dimensional technique of data collection, was used to identify areas of neuronal activation associated with volitional inspiration and separately with volitional expiration in five normal male subjects. A comparison of the activated areas was also undertaken to isolate regions specific for one or other active task.2. Scans were performed during intravenous infusion of H2150 under conditions of (a) volitional inspiration with passive expiration, (b) passive inspiration with volitional expiration and (c) passive inspiration with passive expiration. Four measurements in these three conditions were performed in each subject. Breathing pattern was well matched between conditions. 3. Regional increases in brain blood flow, due to increased neural activity associated with either active inspiration or active expiration, were derived using a pixel by pixel comparison of images obtained during the volitional and passive ventilation phases. Data were pooled from all runs in all subjects and were then processed to detect statistically significant (P < 005) increases in rCBF comparing active inspiration with passive inspiration and active expiration with passive expiration.4. During active inspiration significant increases in rCBF were found bilaterally in the primary motor cortex dorsally just lateral to the vertex, in the supplementary motor area, in the right lateral pre-motor cortex and in the left ventrolateral thalamus.5. In active expiration significant increases in rCBF were found in the right and left primary motor cortices dorsally just lateral to the vertex, the right and left primary motor cortices more ventrolaterally, the supplementary motor area, the right lateral pre-motor cortex, the ventrolateral thalamus bilaterally, and the cerebellum.6. Using this modified and more sensitive PET technique, these findings essentially replicate those for volitional inspiration obtained in a previous study. 7. The technique used has been successful in demonstrating the regions of the brain involved in the generation of volitional breathing, and probably in the volitional modulation of automatic breathing patterns such as would be required for the production of speech.

The main objective of the present study was to test the hypothesis that patients with cardiopulmonary disease can reliably identify different sensory qualities of their experience of breathlessness. A secondary aim was to examine whether there was any relationship between such specific descriptors of the sensation of breathlessness and a patient's clinical diagnosis. A randomly ordered list of 45 descriptors of breathing discomfort related to exertion was administered on two occasions to 208 patients with cardiopulmonary disease; patients identified the descriptors that applied to their own experience. A total of 169 patients were considered reliable in that their responses were repeatable between questionnaires; there was evidence that an individual's reliability could be assessed by asking repeat questions within a questionnaire. With these patients, individual descriptors generated different degrees of yes and no response and were answered with a variable consistency, suggesting that some questions may be more useful than others in discriminating between the quality of patients' sensations. Overall, patients with obstructive disorders (asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease [COAD]) answered yes more often than those with restrictive or cardiac conditions, possibly reflecting differences in severity of disease. A cluster analysis separated the descriptors into 12 groups which appeared to describe different aspects of breathing discomfort. Relative to their response to other clusters, COAD patients were more inclined to identify distress, asthma patients to indicate wheeziness, restrictive patients to report rapid breathing, and the cardiac group to describe a need to sign. A second cluster analysis separated patients into 12 groups based on responses for the descriptor clusters.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)