second model, the two main conditions were parametrically modulated by the two categories, respectively (SOM, S5.1). The activation of the precuneus was higher for hard dominance-solvable games than for easy ones ( Fig. 4A and table S10). The activation of the insula was higher for the highly focal coordination games than for less focal ones ( Fig. 4B and table S11). Previous studies also found that precuneus activity increased when the number of planned moves increased (40, 41). The higher demand for memory-related imagery and memory retrieval may explain the greater precuneus activation in hard dominance-solvable games. In highly focal coordination games, the participants may have felt quite strongly that the pool students must notice the same salient feature. This may explain why insula activation correlates with NCI.Participants might have disagreed about which games were difficult. We built a third model to investigate whether the frontoparietal activation correlates with how hard a dominance-solvable game is and whether the activation in insula and ACC correlates with how easy a coordination game is. Here, the two main conditions were parametrically modulated by each participant's probability of obtaining a reward in each game (SOM, S2.2 and S5.2). We found a negative correlation between the activation of the precuneus and the participant's probability of obtaining a reward in dominance-solvable games ( Fig. 4C and table S12), which suggests that dominance-solvable games that yielded lower payoffs presented harder mental challenges. In a previous study on working memory, precuneus activity positively correlated with response times, a measure of mental effort (24). Both findings are consistent with the interpretation that subjective measures reflecting harder tasks (higher efforts) correlate with activation in precuneus. A positive correlation between insula activation and the participant's probability of obtaining a reward again suggests that coordination games with a highly salient feature strongly activated the "gut feeling" reported by many participants (Fig. 4D and table S13). A previous study found that the subjective rating of "chills intensity" in music correlates with activation of insula (42). Both findings are consistent with the interpretation that the subjective intensity of how salient a stimulus is correlates with activation in insula.As mentioned, choices were made significantly faster in coordination games than in dominancesolvable games. The results of the second and third models provide additional support for the idea that intuitive and deliberative mental processes have quite different properties. The "slow and effortful" process was more heavily taxed when the dominance-solvable games were harder. The "fast and effortless" process was more strongly activated when coordination was easy.
Administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) induces a surge of luteinizing hormone and ovulation in a variety of species, including human beings. Our objectives were to determine the effect of follicle size at the time of ovulation on corpus luteum function and establishment and maintenance of pregnancy in cows in which ovulation was either spontaneous or induced with GnRH. GnRH-induced ovulation of follicles Շ11 mm in diameter resulted in decreased pregnancy rates and increased late embryonic mortality. This decrease in fertility was associated with lower circulating concentrations of estradiol on the day of insemination, a decreased rate of increase in progesterone after insemination, and, ultimately, decreased circulating concentrations of progesterone. In contrast, ovulatory follicle size had no apparent effect on fertility when ovulation occurred spontaneously. Follicles undergoing spontaneous ovulation do so at a wide range of sizes when they are physiologically mature. Therefore, administration of GnRH to induce ovulation likely initiates a preovulatory gonadotropin surge before some dominant follicles attain physiological maturity. GnRH-induced ovulation of follicles that are physiologically immature has a negative impact on pregnancy rates and late embryonic͞fetal survival. These observations in cattle may have implications for assisted reproductive procedures in human beings.ovulation ͉ cattle ͉ artificial insemination ͉ embryonic mortality ͉ fertility P rocedures that control the timing of ovulation in human beings and other mammals are of enormous value in advancing the use of assisted reproductive technologies. In cattle, several protocols are effective at controlling the estrous cycle and reducing the time required to detect estrus (1-3), but the timing of ovulation is imprecise, which makes it difficult to inseminate cows at a fixed time. When fixed-time insemination protocols (protocols that synchronize ovulation) are attempted, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is used to induce ovulation. In some synchronization protocols, GnRH is administered 9 days before insemination to induce ovulation and corpus luteum (CL) formation and to initiate a new follicular wave. Two days before insemination, prostaglandin F 2␣ is administered to induce luteolysis, and 48 h later, GnRH is administered to induce ovulation of the preovulatory follicle (4, 5). Insemination is performed at the time of the second GnRH injection (4) or 16-24 h after the second GnRH injection (5).Bovine follicles achieve ovulatory capacity at Ϸ10 mm in diameter. However, a larger dose of luteinizing hormone is required to induce ovulation of a 10-mm follicle than to induce ovulation of larger follicles (6). In cattle, the efficiency of a single injection of GnRH to induce ovulation and thereby synchronize the initiation of the subsequent follicular wave is only 66% when evaluated across all stages of the estrous cycle (7). Because of this variation in ovulatory response, we hypothesized that considerable variation would e...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.