, for the Pediatric Rituximab/ITP Study Group and the Glaser Pediatric Research NetworkWe assessed safety and efficacy of rituximab in a prospective study of 36 patients, age 2.6 to 18.3 years, with severe chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). The primary outcome of sustained platelets above 50 ؋ 10 9 /L (50 000/ mm 3 ) during 4 consecutive weeks, starting in weeks 9 to 12, was achieved by 11 of 36 patients (31%, confidence interval [CI], 16% to 48%). Median response time was 1 week (range, 1 to 7 weeks). Attainment of the primary outcome was not associated with age, prior pharmacologic responses, prior splenectomy, ITP duration, screening platelet count, refractoriness, or IgM reduction. First-dose, infusion-related toxicity was common (47%) despite premedication. Significant drug-related toxicities included thirddose hypotension (n ‫؍‬ 1) and serum sickness (n ‫؍‬ 2). Peripheral B cells were depleted in all subjects. IgM decreased 3.4% per week, but IgG did not significantly decrease. Rituximab was well tolerated, with manageable infusion-related side effects, but 6% of subjects developed serum sickness. Rituximab is beneficial for some pediatric patients with severe, chronic ITP.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder with isolated thrombocytopenia and hemorrhagic risk. While many children with ITP can be safely observed, treatments are often needed for various reasons, including to decrease

The t(2;5)(p23;q35) translocation was initially identified in cases of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) that expressed the Ki-1 (CD30) antigen. We have recently cloned this translocation and shown it to encode a chimeric product consisting of the N-terminal portion of a nonribosomal nucleolar phosphoprotein, nucleophosmin (NPM), from chromosome 5, fused to the kinase domain of a novel transmembrane tyrosine-specific protein kinase, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), from chromosome 2. To better define the spectrum of lymphomas that contain this translocation, we have analyzed 70 cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) for expression of the t(2;5)-derived NPM/ALK chimeric message by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Using a previously described set of oligonucleotide primers, NPM/ALK chimeric transcripts were detected in 21 of 22 cases that contained the t(2;5) by cytogenetic analysis and in 10 of 48 cases that either lacked evidence of the t(2;5) or had unsuccessful cytogenetics. In all but 1 case, the NPM/ALK PCR products were of identical size and sequence, suggesting that the genomic chromosome breaks are clustered in a single intron in both NPM and ALK. The NPM/ALK-expressing cases were not confined to NHLs with anaplastic morphology and included 15 ALCLs, 6 immunoblastic lymphomas, and 10 diffuse large-cell lymphomas. Moreover, only slightly greater than half of the cases with anaplastic morphology and 59% of CD30-expressing cases were NPM/ALK positive. Thus, neither anaplastic morphology nor the expression of CD30 accurately predicted the presence of this molecular genetic subtype of lymphoma.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune bleeding disorder which presents with isolated thrombocytopenia and risk of hemorrhage. While most children with ITP promptly recover with or without drug therapy, ITP is persistent or chronic in others. When needed, how to select second-line therapies is not clear. ICON1, conducted within the Pediatric ITP Consortium of North America (ICON), is a prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study of 120 children from 21 centers starting second-line treatments for ITP which examined treatment decisions. Treating physicians reported reasons for selecting therapies, ranking the top three. In a propensity weighted model, the most important factors were patient/parental preference (53%) and treatment-related factors: side effect profile (58%), long-term toxicity (54%), ease of administration (46%), possibility of remission (45%), and perceived efficacy (30%). Physician, health system, and clinical factors rarely influenced decision-making. Patient/parent preferences were selected as reasons more often in chronic ITP (85.7%) than in newly diagnosed (0%) or persistent ITP (14.3%, P = .003). Splenectomy and rituximab were chosen for the possibility of inducing long-term remission (P < .001). Oral agents, such as eltrombopag and immunosuppressants, were chosen for ease of administration and expected adherence (P < .001). Physicians chose rituximab in patients with lower expected adherence (P = .017). Treatment choice showed some physician and treatment center bias. This study illustrates the complexity and many factors involved in decision-making in selecting second-line ITP treatments, given the absence of comparative trials. It highlights shared decision-making and the need for well-conducted, comparative effectiveness studies to allow for informed discussion between patients and clinicians.