Background:The aim of this study was to assess the robustness of cardiac SPECT radiomics features against changes in imaging settings including acquisition and reconstruction settings.
Methods: Four scanners were used to acquire SPECT scans of a cardiac phantom with 5mCi of 99m Tc. The effects of different image acquisition and reconstruction settings including the Number of View, View Matrix Size, attenuation correction, image reconstruction algorithm, number of iterations, number of subsets, type of filter, full width at half maximum (FWHM) of Gaussian filter, Butterworth filter order, and Butterworth filter cut-off were studied. In total 5263 different images were reconstructed. Eighty-seven radiomic features including first, second, and high order textures were extracted from images. To assess reproducibility and repeatability the coefficient of variation (COV) was used for each image feature over the different imaging settings. Result: IDMN and IDN features from GLCM, RP from GLRLM, ZE from GLSZM, and DE from GLDM feature sets were the only features that were the most reproducible (COV ≤ 5%) against changes in all imaging settings. In addition, the IDMN feature from GLCM, LALGLE, SALGLE and LGLZE from GLSZM, and SDLGLE from GLDM feature sets were the features that were less reproducible (COV>20 %) against changes in all imaging settings. Matrix size has the greatest impact on feature variability as most of features are not repeatable and 82.76% of them had (COV>20 %). Conclusion: Repeatability and reproducibility of SPECT/CT radiomics texture features in different imaging settings is feature-dependent, and different image acquisitions and reconstructions have different effects on radiomics texture features. Low COV radiomics features could be consider for further clinical studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.