Actinopterygians (ray-finned fishes) are the most diverse living osteichthyan (bony vertebrate) group, with a rich fossil record. However, details of their earliest history during the middle Palaeozoic (Devonian) ‘Age of Fishes' remains sketchy. This stems from an uneven understanding of anatomy in early actinopterygians, with a few well-known species dominating perceptions of primitive conditions. Here we present an exceptionally preserved ray-finned fish from the Late Devonian (Middle Frasnian, ca 373 Ma) of Pas-de-Calais, northern France. This new genus is represented by a single, three-dimensionally preserved skull. CT scanning reveals the presence of an almost complete braincase along with near-fully articulated mandibular, hyoid and gill arches. The neurocranium differs from the coeval Mimipiscis in displaying a short aortic canal with a distinct posterior notch, long grooves for the lateral dorsal aortae, large vestibular fontanelles and a broad postorbital process. Identification of similar but previously unrecognized features in other Devonian actinopterygians suggests that aspects of braincase anatomy in Mimipiscis are apomorphic, questioning its ubiquity as stand-in for generalized actinopterygian conditions. However, the gill skeleton of the new form broadly corresponds to that of Mimipiscis, and adds to an emerging picture of primitive branchial architecture in crown gnathostomes. The new genus is recovered in a polytomy with Mimiidae and a subset of Devonian and stratigraphically younger actinopterygians, with no support found for a monophyletic grouping of Moythomasia with Mimiidae.

MOTS CLÉSChordata, Craniata, animal-conodonte, codage des caractères, analyse cladistique, paléohistologie. KEY WORDSChordata, Craniata, conodont animals/ elements, character coding, cladistic analysis, palaeo-histology. ABSTRACTAn evidence-based reassessment of the phylogenetic relationships of conodonts shows that they are not "stem" gnathostomes, nor vertebrates, and not even craniates. A signifi cant group of conodont workers have proposed or accepted a craniate designation for the conodont animal, an interpretation that is increasingly becoming established as accepted "fact". Against this prevailing trend, our conclusion is based on a revised analysis of traditional morphological features of both discrete conodont elements and apparatuses, histological investigation and a revised cladistic analysis modifying that used in the keystone publication promoted as proof of the hypothesis that conodonts are vertebrates. Our study suggests that conodonts possibly were not even chordates but demonstration of this is beyond the scope of this paper. To summarize, in conodonts there is low cephalization; presence of simple V-shaped trunk musculature and unique large-crystal albid material in the elements; lack of a dermal skeleton including characteristic vertebrate hard tissues of bone, dentine and enamel; lack of odontodes with bone of attachment and a unique pulp system; lack of segmentally-arranged paraxial elements and dermal elements in median fi ns, all of which supports neither a vertebrate nor a craniate relationship for conodonts. RÉSUMÉ Des pseudo-dents : une réévaluation des relations phylogénétiques des conodontes et des vertébrés.Une réévaluation des relations phylogénétiques des conodontes est fondée sur de nouvelles preuves. Elle montre que les conodontes ne sont ni des gnathostomes-souches, ni des vertébrés, ni même des crâniates. Un groupe signifi catif de spécialistes des conodontes a proposé, ou accepté, que ces organismes soient considérés comme des crâniates, une interprétation qui est en train de s'installer en tant que fait avéré. Notre conclusion va à l'encontre de cette tendance ; elle est fondée sur une révision des traits morphologiques traditionnels à la fois des éléments isolés et des assemblages de conodontes, sur les données histologiques et sur une analyse cladistique révisée, ce qui modifi e les conclusions de la publication principale qui a promu l'hypothèse selon laquelle les conodontes seraient des vertébrés. Notre étude suggère même que les conodontes n'aient pas été des chordés, mais la démonstration de cette hypothèse va au-delà de l'objectif de cet article. En résumé, chez les conodontes, le degré de céphalisation est faible ; la musculature du tronc a une forme simple en V ; les éléments isolés montrent un tissu blanc avec des cristaux de grande taille, uniques pour ce tissu ; il n'y a pas de squelette dermique incluant les tissus durs caractéristiques des vertébrés tels que l'os, la dentine et l'émail ; il n'y a pas d'odontodes avec leur os et leur système pulpaire unique ; il ...