Robotic thymectomy is a safe and effective procedure. We observed a neurologic benefit in a great number of patients. A better clinical outcome was obtained in patients with early Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America class.

Robotic thymectomy for early-stage thymoma is a technically safe and feasible procedure with low complication rate and shorter hospital stay compared to the trans-sternal approach. Cost analysis revealed lower expenses for the robotic procedure due to the reduced hospital stay. The oncological outcomes seemed comparable, but longer follow-up is needed.

Results suggest that, in experienced and skilled hands, conservative procedures are the treatment of choice for the management of paediatric bronchial carcinoids. Relapses can be successfully treated with re-operation and they can occur even after many years, underlining the importance of long-term follow-up.

Alveolar air leaks, often resulting from lung tissue traumatization during dissection of fissures, still remain a challenging problem in lung surgery. Several tools and techniques have been used to reduce air leakage, but none was judged ideal. This prospective, randomized trial was designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of completion of fissures during pulmonary lobectomy by using a laser system. A standard stapler technique was used for comparison; the primary goal was to reach at least a comparable result. Forty-four patients were enrolled, 22 were treated with standard technique by using staplers (S) and 22 underwent laser (L) dissection. Randomization to one of the two groups was intraoperative after evaluating the presence of incomplete fissure (grade 3-4 following Craig's classification). A Thulium laser 2010 nm (Cyber TM, Quanta System, Italy) was used at power of 40 W. Outcome primary measures were the evaluation and duration of intra- and postoperative air leaks, the rate of complications, and the hospital stay. Air leaks (2.1 ± 4.2 vs 3.6 ± 7.2 days; p = 0.98) and chest tube duration (6.4 ± 4.2 vs 7.5 ± 6.3 days, p = 0.44) were lower in L compared with S group even if these were not statistically significant. Complications (36.4 vs 77.3 %; p = 0.006), hospital stay (6.9 ± 3.8 vs 9.9 ± 6.9 days; p = 0.03), hospitalization costs (5,650 vs 8,147 euros; p = 0.01), and procedure costs (77 % of difference; p < 0.0001) were significantly lower for L group, while operative time was longer (197 ± 34 vs 158 ± 41 min; p = 0.004). The use of laser dissection to prevent postoperative air leaks is effective and comparable with stapler technique. Aero-haemostatic laser properties (by sealing of small blood vessels and checking air leaks) allow a safe application during pulmonary lobectomy in interlobar fissure completion avoiding stapler use.

The objective of the study was to evaluate the outcome in elderly patients (>75 years) submitted to pneumonectomy for lung cancer. Records of 40 elderly patients, who underwent pneumonectomy at our Institution from 1990 to 2008, were retrospectively reviewed. This group was compared with 289 younger patients submitted to pneumonectomy in the same period. In the older group median age was 77 years (range 75-84 years), 16 were right-side procedures. In the younger group median age was 62 years (range 24-74 years), 114 were right-sided procedures. The overall mortality rate was 7.5% and 6.2% in the older and younger groups, respectively (P=0.75); morbidity rate was 35.1% and 17.7% (P=0.01) and five-year survival rate was 32% and 30%, respectively (P=0.85). Right-sided procedures (P=0.0006) were associated with higher risk of mortality and age over 75 years (P=0.01) with increased risk of morbidity; pathological stage was the only predictor of five-year survival. Pneumonectomy appears to be justified even in patients older than 75 years, because short- and long-term outcomes can be acceptable and comparable with those of younger patients. Advanced age alone does not justify denying curative resection of lung cancer, but right-sided procedures require a careful pre- and postoperative approach.