Aims: This study was conducted to clarify the taxonomic status of Francisella sp. strain Ehime‐1, a fish pathogen, in relation to the fish pathogens F. piscicida and F. philomiragia subsp. noatunensis and to F. philomiragia subsp. philomiragia.
Methods and Results: Francisella sp. Ehime‐1 was compared to F. piscicida, F. philomiragia subsp. noatunensis and several F. philomiragia subsp. philomiragia isolates through sequencing of the 16S rRNA‐gene and several house‐keeping genes and determination of biochemical and phenotypic properties. Results show that F. piscicida is indistinguishable from F. philomiragia subsp. noatunensis by sequence and phenotypic traits. Francisella sp. Ehime‐1 and F. philomiragia subsp. noatunensis are clearly separated from F. philomiragia. Francisella sp. Ehime‐1 is biochemically, phenotypically and genetically different from F. philomiragia subsp. noatunensis (=F. piscicida), but DNA–DNA hybridization does not clearly support establishment as a separate species (level of relatedness 64% and 73·4%, mean 68·7%).
Conclusions: We propose to elevate F. philomiragia subsp. noatunensis to species rank as F. noatunensis comb. nov., while F. piscicida is considered a heterotypic synonym of F. noatunensis comb. nov. Evidence suggests that Francisella sp. Ehime‐1 represents a novel subspecies of F. noatunensis, for which the name F. noatunensis subsp. orientalis subsp. nov. is proposed (=DSM21254T, = LMG24544T).
Significance and Impact of the Study: This study contributes to the taxonomy and characteristics of fish‐pathogenic Francisella spp.
The early diagnosis of pleural infection could be optimized. In this North-European patient population, we suggest that the recommended empiric antimicrobial treatment be changed to cefuroxime plus metronidazole for community-acquired and nosocomial infections.
The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial was to compare topical zinc oxide with placebo mesh on secondary healing pilonidal wounds. Sixty-four (53 men) consecutive patients, aged 17-60 years, were centrally randomized to either treatment with 3% zinc oxide (n = 33) or placebo (n = 31) by concealed allocation. Patients were followed with strict recording of beneficial and harmful effects including masked assessment of time to complete wound closure. Analysis was carried out on an intention-to-treat basis. Median healing times were 54 days (interquartile range 42-71 days) for the zinc and 62 days (55-82 days) for the placebo group (p = 0.32). Topical zinc oxide increased (p < 0.001) wound fluid zinc levels to 1,540 (1,035-2,265) microM and decreased (p < 0.05) the occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus in wounds. Fewer zinc oxide (n = 3) than placebo-treated patients (n = 12) were prescribed postoperative antibiotics (p = 0.005). Serum-zinc levels increased (p < 0.001) postoperatively in both groups but did not differ significantly between the two groups on day 7. Zinc oxide was not associated with increased pain by the visual analog scale, cellular abnormalities by histopathological examination of wound biopsies, or other harmful effects. Larger clinical trials will be required to show definitive effects of topical zinc oxide on wound healing and infection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.