No abstract

No abstract

Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy could affect effective drug concentrations via adsorption onto the oxygenator or associated circuit. We describe a case of a 25-year-old female who required a veno-arterial ECMO therapy for refractory cardiac arrest due to massive pulmonary embolism. She had mild renal dysfunction as a result of the cardiac arrest. A total of 2 g of intravenous cefazolin 8-hourly was administered. Pre- and post-oxygenator blood samples were collected at 0, 1, 4, and 8 h post antibiotic administration. Samples were analyzed for total and unbound cefazolin concentrations. Protein binding was ∼60%. Clearance was reduced due to impaired renal function. The pharmacokinetics of cefazolin appear to not be affected by ECMO therapy and dosing adjustment may not be required.

No abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy could affect drug concentrations via adsorption onto the oxygenator and/or associated circuit. We describe a case of a 33‐year‐old man with severe respiratory failure due to Pneumocystis jirovecii infection on a background of recently diagnosed human immunodeficiency virus infection. He required venovenous ECMO therapy for refractory respiratory failure. Intravenous sulfamethoxazole‐trimethoprim (100 and 20 mg/kg/day) was administered in a dosing regimen every 6 hours. Pre‐oxygenator, post‐oxygenator, and arterial blood samples were collected after antibiotic administration and were analyzed for total sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim concentrations. The peak sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim concentrations were 122 mg/L and 5.3 mg/L, respectively. The volume of distribution for sulfamethoxazole was 0.37 and 2.30 L/kg for trimethoprim. The clearance for sulfamethoxazole was 0.35 ml/minute/kg and for trimethoprim was 1.64 ml/minute/kg. The pharmacokinetics of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim appear not to be affected by ECMO therapy, and dosing adjustment may not be required.