Background:Body mass index (BMI) has been associated with the risk of oesophageal cancer. But the influence of BMI on postoperative complication and prognosis has always been controversial.Methods:In total, 2031 consecutive patients who underwent oesophagectomy between 1998 and 2008 were classified according to Asian-specific BMI (kg m−2) cutoff values. The impact of BMI on overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models. We performed a meta-analysis to examine the association of BMI with OS and postoperative complication.Results:Patients with higher BMI had more postoperative complication (P=0.002), such as anastomotic leakage (P=0.016) and cardiovascular diseases (P<0.001), but less incidence of chylous leakage (P=0.010). Logistic regression analysis showed that BMI (P=0.005) was a confounding factor associated with postoperative complication. Multivariate analysis showed that overweight and obese patients had a more favourable survival than normal weight patients (HR (hazard ratio) = 0.80, 95% CI (confidence interval): 0.70–0.92, P=0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that the association with higher BMI and increased OS was observed in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) (P<0.001), oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) (P=0.034), never-smoking (P=0.035), ever-smoking (P=0.035), never alcohol consumption (P=0.005), weight loss (P=0.003) and advanced pathological stage (P<0.001). The meta-analysis further corroborated that higher BMI was associated with increased complication of anastomotic leakage (RR (risk ratio)=1.04, 95% CI: 1.02–1.06, P=0.001), wound infection (RR=1.03, 95% CI: 1.00–1.05, P=0.031) and cardiovascular diseases (RR=1.02, 95% CI: 1.00–1.05, P=0.039), but decreased incidence of chylous leakage (RR=0.98, 95% CI: 0.96–0.99, P<0.001). In addition, high BMI could significantly improved OS (HR=0.78, 95% CI: 0.71–0.85, P<0.001).Conclusion:Preoperative BMI was an independent prognostic factor for survival, and strongly associated with postoperative complications in oesophageal cancer.

The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival of patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinomas is still controversial, and the subgroup of patients who will most likely benefit from the adjuvant chemotherapy on long-term survival has not yet been identified clearly. Studies published from 1995 to May 2012 were searched in Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cancerlit, the Cochrane Library, CNKI and major scientific meetings. Randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies comparing surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy with surgery alone in patients with resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinomas were included. Eleven studies with a total of 2047 patients were identified, consisting of the adjuvant chemotherapy arm (n = 887) and surgery-alone arm (n = 1160). There was not statistically significant benefit on 3-year overall survival for adjuvant chemotherapy (risk ratio [RR] = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 1.09; P = 0.25). Adjuvant chemotherapy could significantly prolong the 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) (RR = 0.68, 95%CI, 0.51 to 0.89; P = 0.006), but not 3-year DFS (RR = 0.97, 95%CI, 0.73 to 1.29; P = 0.84). Further analysis showed that patients with stage III-IV diseases could benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy on 3-year overall survival (RR = 0.43, 95%CI, 0.31 to 0.61; P = 0.00001), but not in the case of patients with stageI-IIdiseases (RR = 1.12, 95%CI, 0.65 to 1.93; P = 0.68). Additionally, patients with positive lymph node could benefit on 5-year DFS from adjuvant chemotherapy (RR = 0.79, 95%CI, 0.64 to 0.99; P = 0.04). The modality treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of thoracic esophagus might be determined according to pathological stage or the status of lymph node metastasis.

Adding the removal of RLN LNs might improve OS and DFS with acceptable morbidity for patients with ESCC.

Alcohol is a well-established cause of esophageal carcinoma, but its effect on survival is little known and contradictory. To clarify whether drinking is an independent predictor of survival in esophageal carcinoma, 2151 Chinese patients, receiving surgical resection from January 1997 to December 2008, were followed until March 2014. Cox proportional hazards analysis was applied to evaluate the prognostic effect of alcohol consumption. The median follow-up was 64 months. The median overall survival (OS; 42 months) and disease-free survival (DFS; 33 months) for never-drinkers were significantly higher than ever-drinkers (27 and 22 months, respectively). In the multivariate Cox model that was adjusted for age, weight loss, stage according to criteria set by the American Joint Committee on Cancer, radicality of surgery, adjuvant treatment, smoking status, and gender, the hazard ratios of ever-drinking were 1.22 (1.06–1.41, P = 0.005) on OS, and 1.16 (1.01–1.34, P = 0.037) on DFS. The hazardous effect on OS and DFS of drinking grew statistically significantly in a dose-dependent manner with increasing amount of alcohol consumption per day (both P-value for trend < 0.05). The predictive effect of drinking on OS (P = 0.596) or DFS (P = 0.207) was not significant in the subgroup with esophageal adenocarcinoma (n = 195). The current study revealed that the survival is shortened, of those patients who consume alcohol before diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, which are not attributable to differences in stage, smoking status, and gender. Alcohol control should be emphasized to reduce mortality of esophageal carcinoma, and further outcome studies should include alcohol as a potential prognosticator.

BackgroundNestin is associated with neoplastic transformation, but the mechanisms by which nestin contributes to invasion and malignancy of lung cancer remain unknown. Considering that proliferation is necessary for malignant behavior, we investigated the mechanism of nestin action in association with the proliferative properties of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsNestin expression was examined in NSCLC specimens and cell lines. Associations with clinicopathological features, including prognosis and proliferative markers, were evaluated. Effects of nestin knockdown on proliferation and the signaling pathways involved were further investigated.ResultsNestin was expressed in most cancer specimens and all the tumor cell lines analyzed. High nestin expression in malignant tissue was associated with high Ki-67 or PCNA levels and poor patient outcomes. Conversely, knockdown of nestin expression led to significant inhibition of tumor cell proliferation, decreased colony forming ability, and cell cycle G1 arrest. Furthermore, nestin knockdown resulted in inhibition of Akt and GSK3β activation.ConclusionsOur data demonstrate that nestin expression in NSCLC cells is associated with poor prognosis of patients and tumor cell proliferation pathway. Downregulation of nestin efficiently inhibited lung cancer cell proliferation, which might be through affecting cell cycle arrest and Akt-GSK3β-Rb signaling pathway.