Late-life depression is characterized by slowed information processing, which affects all realms of cognition. This supports the concept that frontostriatal dysfunction plays a key role in LLD. The putative role of some risk factors was validated (eg, advanced age, low education, depression severity), whereas others were not (eg, medical burden, age at onset of first depressive episode). Further studies of neuropsychological functioning in remitted LLD patients are needed to parse episode-related and persistent factors and to relate them to underlying neural dysfunction.
Background
Chronic insomnia is a common health problem with substantial consequences in older adults. Cognitive behavioral treatments are efficacious but not widely available. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of brief behavioral treatment for insomnia (BBTI) vs an information control (IC) condition.
Methods
A total of 79 older adults (mean age, 71.7 years; 54 women [70%]) with chronic insomnia and common comorbidities were recruited from the community and 1 primary care clinic. Participants were randomly assigned to either BBTI, consisting of individualized behavioral instructions delivered in 2 intervention sessions and 2 telephone calls, or IC, consisting of printed educational material. Both interventions were delivered by a nurse clinician. The primary outcome was categorically defined treatment response at 4 weeks, based on sleep questionnaires and diaries. Secondary outcomes included self-report symptom and health measures, sleep diaries, actigraphy, and polysomnography.
Results
Categorically defined response (67% [n=26] vs 25% [n=10]; χ2=13.8) (P<.001) and the proportion of participants without insomnia (55% [n=21] vs 13% [n=5]; χ2=15.5) (P<.001) were significantly higher for BBTI than for IC. The number needed to treat was 2.4 for each outcome. No differential effects were found for subgroups according to hypnotic or antidepressant use, sleep apnea, or recruitment source. The BBTI produced significantly better outcomes in self-reported sleep and health (group × time interaction, F5,73=5.99, P<.001), sleep diary (F8,70= 4.32, P<.001), and actigraphy (F4,74=17.72, P<.001), but not polysomnography. Improvements were maintained at 6months.
Conclusion
We found that BBTI is a simple, efficacious, and durable intervention for chronic insomnia in older adults that has potential for dissemination across medical settings.
Older adults with specific EEG sleep characteristics have an excess risk of dying beyond that associated with age, gender, or medical burden. The findings suggest that interventions to optimize and protect older adults' sleep initiation, continuity, and quality may be warranted.
Summary
Background
Treatment-resistant major depressive disorder is common and potentially life-threatening in older persons, in whom little is known about the benefits and risks of augmentation pharmacotherapy.
Methods
We conducted a multi-site, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial to test the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole augmentation for older adults with treatment-resistant depression. We treated 468 participants aged 60 and older with current major depressive episode with venlafaxine extended-release (ER); 96 (20.5%) did not complete this open phase, 191 (40.8%) remitted, and 181 (38.7%) did not remit and were randomized to 12 weeks of double-blind augmentation with aripiprazole or placebo. The computer-generated randomization was done in blocks and stratified by site. The primary endpoint was remission, defined as Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores ≤10 (and at least two points below the score at the start of the randomized phase) at both of the final two consecutive visits. We also assessed resolution of suicidal ideation, and safety and tolerability with cardiometabolic and neurological measures. Analyses were conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00892047.
Findings
Older adults on aripiprazole had a higher remission rate than those on placebo (44% versus 29%; odds ratio [OR]=2.0, 95% CI 1.1–3.7, p=0.03; number needed to treat [NNT]=6.6 [95% CI 3.5–81.8]). Overall, remission was stable during 12 additional weeks of continuation treatment. The resolution of suicidal ideation was more marked with aripiprazole than with placebo. Akathisia was the most common adverse effect (27% of participants on aripiprazole). Compared to placebo, aripiprazole was also associated with more Parkinsonism but not with treatment-emergent suicidal ideation, QTc prolongation, or increases in adiposity, glucose, insulin, or lipids.
Interpretation
In older adults who fail to achieve remission from depression with a first-line antidepressant, the addition of aripiprazole is effective in achieving and sustaining remission. Tolerability concerns include potential for akathisia and Parkinsonism.
Funding
National Institute of Mental Health, UPMC Endowment in Geriatric Psychiatry, Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and the Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.