Children are in contact with local environments, which may affect respiratory symptoms and allergic sensitization. We aimed to assess the effect of the environment and the walkability surrounding schools on lung function, airway inflammation and autonomic nervous system activity. Data on 701 children from 20 primary schools were analysed. Lung function, airway inflammation and pH from exhaled breath condensate were measured. Pupillometry was performed to evaluate autonomic activity. Land use composition and walkability index were quantified within a 500 m buffer zone around schools. The proportion of effects explained by the school environment was measured by mixed-effect models. We found that green school areas tended to be associated with higher lung volumes (FVC, FEV1 and FEF25–75%) compared with built areas. FVC was significantly lower in-built than in green areas. After adjustment, the school environment explained 23%, 34% and 99.9% of the school effect on FVC, FEV1, and FEF25–75%, respectively. The walkability of school neighbourhoods was negatively associated with both pupil constriction amplitude and redilatation time, explaining −16% to 18% of parasympathetic and 8% to 29% of sympathetic activity. Our findings suggest that the environment surrounding schools has an effect on the lung function of its students. This effect may be partially mediated by the autonomic nervous system.

Analysis of the exhaled breath condensate volatilome allowed the distinction of paediatric individuals with a medical diagnosis of asthma, identifying those in need of corticosteroid therapy.

Background: According to studies performed on terrestrial sports athletes, inspiratory muscle training (IMT) may improve athletes’ performance. However, evidence of its effects in elite swimmers is lacking. Therefore, we aimed to assess the effect of 12-week IMT on swimming performance, inspiratory muscle strength, lung function, and perceived breathlessness in elite swimmers. Methods: Elite swimmers from the main FC Porto swimming team (in competitive training for a minimum period of 3 years) were invited to participate and were randomly allocated into intervention or control groups. The intervention group performed 30 inspiratory efforts, twice a day, 5 times a week, against a pressure threshold load equivalent to 50% of maximal inspiratory pressure, whereas the control group performed inspiratory efforts at the same frequency but against a 15% load. Swimming performance was assessed through time trials, converted into points according to International Swimming Federation Points Table. Outcomes were evaluated before and following the 12-week study period. Results: A total of 32 participants (22 girls) were included. The median age was 15 and 14 years old for the intervention (n = 17) and control (n = 12) groups, respectively. No differences were found in swimming performance (P = .271), inspiratory muscle strength ( P = .914), forced vital capacity ( P = .262), forced expiratory volume in 1st second ( P = .265), peak expiratory flow ( P = .270), and perceived breathlessness ( P = .568) between groups after 12 weeks of intervention. Conclusion: Twelve weeks of IMT had no effect on swimming performance, lung function, and perceived breathlessness in elite swimmers. These results may be related to swimming-specific factors and/or an applied load insufficient to achieve training overload that could induce further improvements.