Levonorgestrel-releasing IUD therapy for the conservative treatment of complex atypical hyperplasia or early-grade endometrial cancer resulted in return to normal histology in a majority of patients.

No abstract

IntroductionThe incidence of breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy is expected to increase as more women delay childbearing in the United States. Treatment of cancer in pregnant women requires prudent judgment to balance the benefit to the cancer patient and the risks to the fetus. Prospective data on the outcomes of children exposed to chemotherapy in utero are limited for the breast cancer population.MethodsBetween 1992 and 2010, 81 pregnant patients with breast cancer were treated in a single-arm, institutional review board–approved study with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. Labor and delivery records were reviewed for each patient and neonate. In addition, the parents or guardians were surveyed regarding the health outcomes of the children exposed to chemotherapy in utero.ResultsIn total, 78% of the women (or next of kin) answered a follow-up survey. At a median age of 7 years, most of the children exposed to chemotherapy in utero were growing normally without any significant exposure-related toxicity or health problems. Three children were born with congenital abnormalities: one each with Down syndrome, ureteral reflux or clubfoot. The rate of congenital abnormalities in the cohort was similar to the national average of 3%.ConclusionsDuring the second and third trimesters, pregnant women with breast cancer can be treated with FAC safely without concerns for serious complications or short-term health concerns for their offspring who are exposed to chemotherapy in utero. Continued long-term follow-up of the children in this cohort is required.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00510367. Other Study ID numbers: ID01-193, NCI-2012-01578. Registration date: 31 July 2007.

Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is associated with high rates of gonadal failure, which is distressing for younger patients desiring to start a family. The perceived importance and optimal timing of discussing fertility- and menopause-related information with women undergoing aggressive treatment such as HSCT is not well defined. Questionnaires were sent to 532 patients who underwent HSCT between January 1987 and September 2004 at the ages of 16 to 50 years. The questionnaire assessed demographic data, the need for fertility- and menopause-related information at various times during treatment, and standardized measures of anxiety, quality of life, and menopausal symptoms. The return rate was 40.2%, with 196 patients participating. Of these, 38% reported that they had discussed fertility-related issues with health-care providers since their diagnosis; 54% had discussed menopause-related issues. At the time of diagnosis, participants considered receiving information on fertility and menopause as being of equal importance. However, after HSCT, information about menopause was considered more important than information on fertility (P < or = .0001). Being <40 years, being childless, desiring to bear children in the future, and having a high score on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) correlated with higher ratings of importance for both fertility- and menopause-related information. Our results suggested that healthcare providers should provide information on fertility and menopause repeatedly throughout the treatment period, and that menopause-related information should be reemphasized after HSCT. Such counseling is crucial for patients who are young and childless.