Objective: To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of the risk of ectopic pregnancy in endometriosis. Data Sources: MEDLINE (OVID), Embase (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO), and Cochrane Library to April 1, 2019. Inclusion criteria were cohort or case-control studies from 1990 onward. Exclusion criteria were cohort studies without controls, case reports or series, or no English full-text. Methods of Study Selection: A total of 1361 titles/abstracts were screened after removal of duplicates, 39 full-texts were requested, and, after 24 studies were excluded, there were 15 studies in the meta-analysis. Tabulation, Integration, and Results: Data were extracted using standardized spreadsheets with 2 independent reviewers, and conflicts were resolved by a third reviewer. We performed random effects calculation of weighted estimated average odds ratio (OR). Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed with the I 2 metric and funnel plots/Egger's test, respectively. The Ottawa-Newcastle Quality Assessment Scale was used with a cutoff of ≥7 for higher quality. There were 10 case-control studies (17 972 ectopic pregnancy cases and 485 266 nonectopic pregnancy controls) and 5 cohort studies (30 609 women with endometriosis and 107 321 women without endometriosis). For case-control studies, endometriosis was associated with increased risk of ectopic pregnancy with an OR of 2.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14−6.21, p = .02). For cohort studies, the OR was 0.95 (95% CI = 0.29−3.11, p = .94), but after post hoc analysis of the studies with a Ottawa-Newcastle score ≥7, the OR was 2.16 (95% CI = 1.67−2.79, p <.001). For both case-control and cohort studies, there was high heterogeneity among studies (I 2 = 93.9% and I 2 = 96.6%, Q test p <.001) but no obvious evidence of systematic bias in the funnel plot, and Egger's test results were not significant (p = .35, p = .70), suggesting no strong publication bias. There were insufficient data to make any conclusions with respect to anatomic characteristics of endometriosis (e.g., stage) or mode of conception (e.g., assisted reproductive technology vs spontaneous). Conclusion: Possible evidence of an association between endometriosis and ectopic pregnancy was observed (OR = 2.16−2.66). However, these results should be considered with caution, owing to high heterogeneity among studies. Continued research is needed to delineate the pregnancy implications of endometriosis.
OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the literature to estimate the prevalence and outcomes of occult tubal carcinoma in BRCA mutation carriers and high-risk patients undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. DATA SOURCE: A search was done using OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov between 1946 and March 2019 with keywords and MeSH terms selected by an expert medical librarian and coauthors. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Two independent reviewers performed study selection with an initial screen on abstracts and a second on full articles. Articles were rejected if they were irrelevant to the study question, pertained to a different population or did not report occult tubal neoplasia. Quality was assessed using methodologic index for nonrandomized studies criteria. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Data were extracted and recorded in an Excel database. Forest plots for the prevalence of occult carcinoma were done using STATA. Among 2,402 studies assessed, 27 met the inclusion criteria for qualitative and quantitative analysis. A total of 6,283 patients underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy between 2002 and 2019: 2,894 cases were BRCA1, 1,579 BRCA2, and 1,810 high-risk based on family history. Among these, 75 patients were diagnosed with occult tubal carcinoma at the time of surgery. The pooled prevalence was 1.2% (I2=7.1%, P=.363) occurring at a median age of 53.2 years (range 42.4–67). In a subanalysis of 18 studies reporting follow-up data, 10 recurrences (18.7%, 95% CI 7.5–53%) and 24 cases of post–risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy peritoneal cancer (0.54%, 95% CI 0.4–1.9%) were reported after a median follow-up of 52.5 months. BRCA1, older age, and previous breast cancer were more often associated with occult malignancy. CONCLUSION: Occult tubal carcinomas found at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk patients and BRCA mutation carriers have significant potential for recurrence despite the frequent administration of postoperative chemotherapy.
The need for sound anatomical knowledge is woven into the daily tasks of all health-care professionals, whether directly (e.g., surgical landmarks) or indirectly (e.g., understanding the pathophysiology of a disease) (Singh et al., 2015). Anatomy educators are searching for new, effective, and innovative means to teach medical trainees and professionals, beginning with two-dimensional (2D) images, plastic models, human cadavers, and, more recently, with the use of augmented reality (AR; Singh et al., 2015). Modern approaches to health sciences education and practice are now evolving with the increasing accessibility, affordability, and advancement of virtual reality (VR) and AR technologies (Gallagher et al., 2005;Riva & Wiederhold, 2015). Technologies such as VR and AR allow the user to understand, explore and appreciate spatial relationships using sensory-driven pathways (Dalgarno et al., 2002;Huang et al., 2010;Wu et al., 2013;Küçük et al., 2016). Despite the frequent use of the term VR and AR, their applications vary across studies. It is therefore vital to not only define these terms, but also have a deeper understanding of the reality-virtuality (RV) continuum by Milgram and
IntroductionSince its approval for adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in 2017, dupilumab has been incorporated into clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). However, recommendations differ internationally, and the quality assessment of their development is unclear.ObjectiveWe aimed to systematically review and appraise the quality of CPGs for adult AD reported since 2017 and map the recommendations for dupilumab initiation relative to conventional systemic therapy (CST).Materials and MethodsA literature search was conducted in June 2020 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and CINAHL. Twelve CPGs were retrieved. Methodological quality was assessed using the validated Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II tool (AGREE-II). Recommendations were extracted and compared.ResultsAGREE-II median scores per domain of the CPGs were (%, r = range): scope/purpose, 78% (50–96); stakeholder involvement, 54% (28–85); rigor of development, 39% (21–63); clarity of presentation, 85% (69–100); applicability, 27% (6–51); and editorial independence, 76% (42–100). Neither met the threshold of 70% quality criteria for rigor of development nor the applicability domains. Three CPGs met the criteria for recommendation without modification. CPGs' approach to dupilumab initiation was as follows: second line, preferred over CST and nbUVB (n = 1/12 CPG); second line, equivalent to CST or nbUVB (n = 3/12 CPGs); third line, after nbUVB or CST (n = 5/12 CPGs); and fourth line after nbUVB and CST (n = 2/12). No consensus was reached for n = 1/12 CPG.Conclusion and RelevanceDupilumab is now incorporated into CPGs for adult AD. These CPGs exhibited good quality in scope/purpose, clarity, and editorial independence domains. However, none met AGREE-II criteria for methodological rigor/applicability. Gaps were found in mechanisms for updates, facilitators/barriers, resource implications, and stakeholder involvement. Only n = 3/12 CPGs met quality criteria for recommendation without modifications. Of these, two favored a conservative sequential approach for the initiation of dupilumab relative to CST, while one did not reach consensus. Our findings highlight divergent recommendations AD treatment, underlining a need to incorporate quality criteria into future guideline development.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.