Purpose FAPI ligands (fibroblast activation protein inhibitor), a novel class of radiotracers for PET/CT imaging, demonstrated in previous studies rapid and high tumor uptake. The purpose of this study is the head-to-head intra-individual comparison of 68Ga-FAPI versus standard-of-care 18F-FDG in PET/CT in organ biodistribution and tumor uptake in patients with various cancers. Material and Methods This international retrospective multicenter analysis included PET/CT data from 71 patients from 6 centers who underwent both 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT within a median time interval of 10 days (range 1–89 days). Volumes of interest (VOIs) were manually drawn in normal organs and tumor lesions to quantify tracer uptake by SUVmax and SUVmean. Furthermore, tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) were generated (SUVmax tumor/ SUVmax organ). Results A total of 71 patients were studied of, which 28 were female and 43 male (median age 60). In 41 of 71 patients, the primary tumor was present. Forty-three of 71 patients exhibited 162 metastatic lesions. 68Ga-FAPI uptake in primary tumors and metastases was comparable to 18F-FDG in most cases. The SUVmax was significantly lower for 68Ga-FAPI than 18F-FDG in background tissues such as the brain, oral mucosa, myocardium, blood pool, liver, pancreas, and colon. Thus, 68Ga-FAPI TBRs were significantly higher than 18F-FDG TBRs in some sites, including liver and bone metastases. Conclusion Quantitative tumor uptake is comparable between 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG, but lower background uptake in most normal organs results in equal or higher TBRs for 68Ga-FAPI. Thus, 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT may yield improved diagnostic information in various cancers and especially in tumor locations with high physiological 18F-FDG uptake.

Purpose The aim of this official guideline coordinated and published by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the German Cancer Society (DKG) was to optimize the screening, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of breast cancer. Method The process of updating the S3 guideline published in 2012 was based on the adaptation of identified source guidelines. They were combined with reviews of evidence compiled using PICO (Patients/Interventions/Control/Outcome) questions and with the results of a systematic search of literature databases followed by the selection and evaluation of the identified literature. The interdisciplinary working groups took the identified materials as their starting point and used them to develop suggestions for recommendations and statements, which were then modified and graded in a structured consensus process procedure. Recommendations Part 2 of this short version of the guideline presents recommendations for the therapy of primary, recurrent and metastatic breast cancer. Loco-regional therapies are de-escalated in the current guideline. In addition to reducing the safety margins for surgical procedures, the guideline also recommends reducing the radicality of axillary surgery. The choice and extent of systemic therapy depends on the respective tumor biology. New substances are becoming available, particularly to treat metastatic breast cancer.

5034 Background: mCRPC has a poor prognosis and immunotherapies are largely ineffective. PSMA is a promising therapeutic target in mCRPC, and pasotuxizumab is a PSMA x CD3 BiTE that mediates tumor cell killing. Methods: NCT01723475 was a first-in-human, multicenter, dose-escalation study in patients (pts) with mCRPC refractory to standard therapy. Pts received pasotuxizumab as a continuous intravenous infusion in cohorts of 3–4 pts. Dose-escalation followed a continuous reassessment methodology design. The primary objective was to determine safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD); secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, biomarkers, and tumor response. Results: 16 pts were enrolled into 5 dosing cohorts (5 µg/d, n = 3; 10 µg/d, n = 4; 20 µg/d, n = 3; 40 µg/d, n = 4; 80 µg/d, n = 2). All pts had ≥1 AE of any grade; most common were fever (94%), chills (69%), and fatigue (50%). 13 pts (81%) had ≥1 AE of grade ≥3; most common were decreased lymphocytes and infections (both 44%). No grade 5 AE occurred. A serious AE related to study drug was reported for 1 pt (fatigue, 20 µg/d). No anti-drug antibodies were observed. Recruitment was stopped before MTD was reached to facilitate initiation of a new study sponsored by Amgen. Antitumor activity as indicated by PSA serum level decline was dose dependent, with a mean best PSA change per dosing cohort versus baseline of +0.74% (5 µg/d), –17.9% (10 µg/d), –37.4% (20 µg/d), –42.5% (40 µg/d) and –54.9% (80 µg/d). PSA decreases of ≥50% occurred in 3 pts (n = 1 each in 20 µg/d, 40 µg/d, and 80 µg/d cohorts). One long-term PSA responder was treated for 14 months (40 µg/d) and one for 19.4 months (80 µg/d). The latter pt showed a complete regression of soft-tissue metastases and marked regression of bone metastases as assessed by PSMA-PET/CT, > 90% reduction in PSA and alkaline phosphatase, and a significant and durable improvement in disease related symptoms. Conclusions: Pasotuxizumab had an acceptable safety profile and dose-dependent clinical activity in mCRPC pts. There were two long term responders in the dose escalation. This is the first clinical study showing that a BiTE immunotherapy can be efficacious in solid tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT01723475.

No abstract