Background: The effectiveness, safety, and pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection patterns of point-by-point high-power, short-duration (HPSD) ablation relative to conventional force-time integral (FTI)-guided strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are unknown.Objectives: To compare 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia (AA), complication rates, procedural times, and PV reconnection patterns with HPSD AF AF ablation versus an FTI-guided low-power, long-duration (LPLD) strategy. Methods:We compared consecutive patients undergoing a first ablation procedure for paroxysmal or persistent AF. The HPSD protocol utilized a power of 50 W and durations of 6-8 s posteriorly and 8-10 s anteriorly. The LPLD protocol was FTI-guided with a power of ≤25 W posteriorly (FTI ≥ 300g•s) and ≤35 W anteriorly (FTI ≥ 400g•s).Results: In total, 214 patients were prospectively included (107 HPSD, 107 LPLD).Freedom from AA at 1 year was achieved in 79% in the HPSD group versus 73% in the LPLD group (p = .339; adjusted hazard ratio with HPSD, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-1.23; p < .004 for non-inferiority). Procedure duration was shorter in the HPSD group (229 ± 60 vs. 309 ± 77 min; p < .005). Patients undergoing repeat ablation had a higher propensity for reconnection at the right PV carina in the HPSD group compared with the LPLD group (14/30 = 46.7% vs. 7/34 = 20.6%; p = .035).There were no differences in complication rates. Conclusion:HPSD AF ablation resulted in similar freedom from AAs at 1 year, shorter procedure times, and a similar safety profile when compared with an LPLD ablation strategy. Patients undergoing HPSD ablation required more applications at the right carina to achieve isolation, and had a significantly higher rate of right carinal reconnections at redo procedures.

SUMMARYIntroduction: An oral loading dose of propafenone 600 mg is used in our center as in other places around the world for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients without structural heart disease. Vernakalant is a novel, safe, and effective drug used intravenously and has proved to be more rapid in converting recent-onset AF to sinus rhythm compared with placebo and amiodarone. There is no study that compares vernakalant with propafenone. The aim of our study is to compare the time taken for conversion of recent-onset AF in patients treated with vernakalant and propafenone. Methods: Thirtysix hemodynamically stable patients with recent-onset AF without structural heart disease were prospectively included. A single oral dose of propafenone 600 mg was administered to 19 patients and 17 received intravenous vernakalant. Clinical and laboratory variables, conversion rate, and time to conversion were recorded. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Time to conversion to sinus rhythm was of 166 min (120-300) in the propafenone group versus 9 min (6-18) in the vernakalant group (P = 0.0001). Conversion rate was of 78% in the propafenone group at 8 h and of 93% in the vernakalant group at 2 h; yet, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.4). Time to conversion had a direct impact in hospital stay, which was 43% shorter in the vernakalant group (P = 0.0001). Conclusion: Time to conversion of AF to sinus rhythm was significantly shorter in the vernakalant group compared with the propafenone group and was associated with shorter hospital stay.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract