Background The risk of severe COVID-19 varies significantly among persons of similar age and is higher in males. Age-independent, sex-biased differences in susceptibility to severe COVID-19 may be ascribable to deficits in a sexually dimorphic protective attribute that we termed immunologic resilience (IR). Objective To examine whether deficits in IR that antedate or are induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection independently predict COVID-19 mortality. Methods IR levels were quantified with two novel metrics: immune health grades (IHG-I [best] to IHG-IV) to gauge CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell count equilibrium, and blood gene expression signatures. IR metrics were examined in a prospective COVID-19 cohort ( n =522); primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Associations of IR metrics with outcomes in non-COVID-19 cohorts ( n =13,461) provided the framework for linking pre-COVID-19 IR status to IR during COVID-19, as well as to clinical outcomes. Results IHG-I, tracking high-grade equilibrium between CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell counts, was the most common grade (73%) among healthy adults, particularly in females. SARS-CoV-2 infection associated with underrepresentation of IHG-I (21%) vs. overrepresentation (77%) of IHG-II or IHG-IV, especially in males vs. females ( P <0.01). Presentation with IHG-I associated with 88% lower mortality, after controlling for age and sex; reduced risk of hospitalization and respiratory failure; lower plasma IL-6 levels; rapid clearance of nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 burden; and gene expression signatures correlating with survival that signify immunocompetence and controlled inflammation. In non-COVID-19 cohorts, IR-preserving metrics associated with resistance to progressive influenza or HIV infection, as well as lower 9-year mortality in the Framingham Heart Study, especially in females. Conclusion Preservation of immunocompetence with controlled inflammation during antigenic challenges is a hallmark of IR and associates with longevity and AIDS resistance. Independent of age, a male-biased proclivity to degrade IR before and/or during SARS-CoV-2 infection predisposes to severe COVID-19. Clinical implications Biomarkers tracking immunologic resilience may have broad prognostic utility, as they associated with longevity, as well as resistance to a progressive disease course during SARS-CoV-2, influenza, or HIV infection.

Background: Signifying the 2-compartments/1-disease paradigm, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) and asthma (AA) are prevalent, comorbid conditions triggered by environmental factors (eg, house dust mites [HDMs]). However, despite the ubiquity of triggers, progression to severe ARC/AA is infrequent, suggesting either resilience or adaptation. Objective: We sought to determine whether ARC/AA severity relates to maladaptive responses to disease triggers. Methods: Adults with HDM-associated ARC were challenged repetitively with HDMs in an aeroallergen challenge chamber. Mechanistic traits associated with disease severity were identified. Results: HDM challenges evoked maladaptive (persistently higher ARC symptoms), adaptive (progressive symptom reduction), and resilient (resistance to symptom induction) phenotypes. Symptom severity in the natural environment was an imprecise correlate of the phenotypes. Nasal airway traits, defined by low inflammation-effectual epithelial integrity, moderate inflammation-effectual epithelial integrity, and higher inflammation-ineffectual epithelial integrity, were hallmarks of the resilient, adaptive, and maladaptive evoked phenotypes, respectively. Highlighting a crosstalk mechanism, peripheral blood inflammatory tone calibrated these traits: ineffectual epithelial integrity associated with CD8 1 T cells, whereas airway inflammation associated with both CD8 1 T cells and eosinophils. Hallmark peripheral blood maladaptive traits were increased natural killer and CD8 1 T cells, lower CD4 1 mucosal-associated invariant T cells, and deficiencies along the TLR-IRF-IFN antiviral pathway. Maladaptive traits tracking HDM-associated ARC also contributed to AA risk and severity models. Conclusions: Repetitive challenges with HDMs revealed that maladaptation to disease triggers may underpin ARC/AA disease severity. A combinatorial therapeutic approach may involve reversal of loss-of-beneficial-function traits (ineffectual epithelial integrity, TLR-IRF-IFN deficiencies), mitigation of gain-ofadverse-function traits (inflammation), and blocking of a detrimental crosstalk between the peripheral blood and airway compartments.