The Maastricht Study is an extensive phenotyping study that focuses on the etiology of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), its classic complications, and its emerging comorbidities. The study uses state-of-the-art imaging techniques and extensive biobanking to determine health status in a population-based cohort of 10,000 individuals that is enriched with T2DM individuals. Enrollment started in November 2010 and is anticipated to last 5-7 years. The Maastricht Study is expected to become one of the most extensive phenotyping studies in both the general population and T2DM participants world-wide. The Maastricht study will specifically focus on possible mechanisms that may explain why T2DM accelerates the development and progression of classic complications, such as cardiovascular disease, retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy and of emerging comorbidities, such as cognitive decline, depression, and gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and respiratory diseases. In addition, it will also examine the association of these variables with quality of life and use of health care resources. This paper describes the rationale, overall study design, recruitment strategy and methods of basic measurements, and gives an overview of all measurements that are performed within The Maastricht Study.

Context Type 2 diabetes is associated with higher bone density (BMD) and, paradoxically, with increased fracture risk. It is not known if low BMD, central to fracture prediction in older adults, identifies fracture risk in diabetic patients. Objective Determine if femoral neck (FN) BMD T-score and FRAX score are associated with fracture in older diabetic adults. Design Three observational studies: Study of Osteoporotic Fractures, Osteoporotic Fractures in Men, and Health, Aging and Body Composition study. Setting Older community-dwelling adults in U.S. Participants 9,449 women; 7,436 men. Main outcome measure(s) Self-reported incident fractures, verified by radiology reports. Results Of 770 diabetic women, 84 experienced a hip and 262 a non-spine fracture during mean (SD) follow-up of 12.6 (5.3) years. Of 1,199 diabetic men, 32 experienced a hip and 133 a non-spine fracture during mean follow-up of 7.9 (2.5) years. Age-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for one unit decrease in FN BMD T-score in diabetic women were 1.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43–2.48) for hip and 1.52 (95% CI, 1.31–1.75) for non-spine fracture. HRs in diabetic men were 5.71 (95% CI, 3.42–9.53) for hip and 2.17 (95% CI, 1.75–2.69) for non-spine fracture. FRAX score was also associated with fracture risk in diabetic participants. However, for a given T-score and age or FRAX score, diabetic participants had a higher fracture risk than those without diabetes. For a similar hip fracture risk, diabetic participants had a higher T-score than non-diabetic participants. The difference in T-score was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.31–0.87) for women and 0.38 (95% CI, 0.09–0.66) for men. Conclusions Among older adults with type 2 diabetes, FN BMD T-score and FRAX score were associated with hip and non-spine fracture risk. However, in these patients, compared with participants without diabetes, fracture risk was higher for a given T-score and age or a given FRAX score.

OBJECTIVEThis study examined the association between objectively measured sedentary activity and metabolic syndrome among older adults.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSData were from 1,367 men and women, aged ≥60 years who participated in the 2003–2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Sedentary time during waking hours was measured by an accelerometer (<100 counts per minute). A sedentary bout was defined as a period of time >5 min. A sedentary break was defined as an interruption in sedentary time (≥100 counts per minute). Metabolic syndrome was defined according to the Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III criteria.RESULTSOn average, people spent 9.5 h (65% of wear time) as sedentary. Compared with people without metabolic syndrome, people with metabolic syndrome spent a greater percentage of time as sedentary (67.3 vs. 62.2%), had longer average sedentary bouts (17.7 vs. 16.7 min), had lower intensity during sedentary time (14.8 vs. 15.8 average counts per minute), and had fewer sedentary breaks (82.3 vs. 86.7), adjusted for age and sex (all P < 0.01). A higher percentage of time sedentary and fewer sedentary breaks were associated with a significantly greater likelihood of metabolic syndrome after adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, education, alcohol consumption, smoking, BMI, diabetes, heart disease, and physical activity. The association between intensity during sedentary time and metabolic syndrome was borderline significant.CONCLUSIONSThe proportion of sedentary time was strongly related to metabolic risk, independent of physical activity. Current results suggest older people may benefit from reducing total sedentary time and avoiding prolonged periods of sedentary time by increasing the number of breaks during sedentary time.