Background The ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine has been approved for emergency use by the UK regulatory authority, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, with a regimen of two standard doses given with an interval of 4–12 weeks. The planned roll-out in the UK will involve vaccinating people in high-risk categories with their first dose immediately, and delivering the second dose 12 weeks later. Here, we provide both a further prespecified pooled analysis of trials of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and exploratory analyses of the impact on immunogenicity and efficacy of extending the interval between priming and booster doses. In addition, we show the immunogenicity and protection afforded by the first dose, before a booster dose has been offered. Methods We present data from three single-blind randomised controlled trials—one phase 1/2 study in the UK (COV001), one phase 2/3 study in the UK (COV002), and a phase 3 study in Brazil (COV003)—and one double-blind phase 1/2 study in South Africa (COV005). As previously described, individuals 18 years and older were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive two standard doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (5 × 10 10 viral particles) or a control vaccine or saline placebo. In the UK trial, a subset of participants received a lower dose (2·2 × 10 10 viral particles) of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 for the first dose. The primary outcome was virologically confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 disease, defined as a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT)-positive swab combined with at least one qualifying symptom (fever ≥37·8°C, cough, shortness of breath, or anosmia or ageusia) more than 14 days after the second dose. Secondary efficacy analyses included cases occuring at least 22 days after the first dose. Antibody responses measured by immunoassay and by pseudovirus neutralisation were exploratory outcomes. All cases of COVID-19 with a NAAT-positive swab were adjudicated for inclusion in the analysis by a masked independent endpoint review committee. The primary analysis included all participants who were SARS-CoV-2 N protein seronegative at baseline, had had at least 14 days of follow-up after the second dose, and had no evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection from NAAT swabs. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose. The four trials are registered at ISRCTN89951424 (COV003) and ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04324606 (COV001), NCT04400838 (COV002), and NCT04444674 (COV005). Findings Between April 23 and Dec 6, 2020, 24 422 participants were recruited and vaccinated across the four studies, of whom 17 178 were included in the primary analysis (8597 receiving ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and 8581 receiving control vaccine). The data cutoff for these analyses was Dec 7, 2020. 332 NAAT-positive infections met the primary endpoint of symptomatic infection more t...

The aim of the study was to devise a strategy for large batch analysis to determine HLA Class II alleles exhibited by candidate bone marrow transplant donors and prospective recipients using previously published DNA-based typing techniques. Special attention was directed towards the technical aspects of procedures, the level of typing resolution and the speed of data analysis. 200 blood samples from volunteer bone marrow transplant donors typed serologically for HLA-DR and DQ were further investigated using three DNA-based typing methods: (i) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis, (ii) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and subsequent hybridisation with sequence specific oligonucleotide probes (PCR-SSO), and (iii) PCR amplification with sequence specific primers (PCR-SSP) to resolve the DRB1* specificity of each individual. In general, the HLA-DR results obtained using PCR-SSO and PCR-SSP correlated well with each other. However, discordant results were obtained between PCR and RFLP based typing in 21 cases, especially in relation to DRB3* alleles associated with the DRB1 gene. These differences were due to three problems pertaining to RFLP analysis: i) alleles with identical DRB, DQA and DQB fragment sizes, ii) reliance on DQA and DQB results to assign the DRB genotype, and iii) a "new polymorphism" of DR7, in a DR7 homozygous, exhibiting a fragment similar in size to DR8. Our findings suggested a strategy requiring PCR-SSO analysis for initial low resolution class II typing involving large numbers of samples, while the use of PCR-SSP is reserved for small numbers of samples, for urgent samples or for situations where higher resolution is required.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the rapid development of a range of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Vaccine induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) is a rare but life-threatening complication of primarily adenoviral based vaccines, associated with the presence of antibodies to a PF4/polyanion neoepitope, measured by ELISA assays. Presented are serial anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies, platelet and D-dimer measurements in a large cohort of patients and their relation to relapse. 51% of patients using the Stago assay had a persistently positive anti-PF4/polyanion levels 100 days post diagnosis whilst 94% of patients monitored using the Immucor assay remain positive. The median duration of positivity of the PF4 assay is 87 days with 72% of patients remaining positive after a median duration of follow up of 105 days. The use of plasma exchange appeared to reduce anti-PF4/polyanion levels and increase platelet counts in the acute setting more rapidly than other therapies. The rate of relapse in this study was 12.6% with all relapsed cases showing persistently positive PF4 antibodies and falling platelet counts. Only one case had extension of their thrombosis. Overall, despite the persistence of PF4 antibodies in 72% of patients, the rate of relapse is low and does not appear to result in recrudescence of the aggressive clinical picture seen at index presentation. Monitoring of these patients in the UK cohort is ongoing and will aid definition of the natural history of this novel condition.

HPA-1a antibodies were associated with protracted PLT-transfusion dependence and significant hemorrhagic complications. Appropriate and timely laboratory investigation for HPA-specific antibodies followed by transfusion support with HPA-selected PLTs provided the cornerstone of the hemostatic management in these cases.