ObjectiveHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), mostly developed in fibrotic/cirrhotic liver, exhibits relatively low responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy. As myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) is pivotal for immunosuppression, we investigated its role and regulation in the fibrotic microenvironment with an aim of developing mechanism-based combination immunotherapy.DesignFunctional significance of MDSCs was evaluated by flow cytometry using two orthotopic HCC models in fibrotic liver setting via carbon tetrachloride or high-fat high-carbohydrate diet and verified by clinical specimens. Mechanistic studies were conducted in human hepatic stellate cell (HSC)-peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture systems and fibrotic-HCC patient-derived MDSCs. The efficacy of single or combined therapy with anti-programmed death-1-ligand-1 (anti-PD-L1) and a clinically trialled BET bromodomain inhibitor i-BET762 was determined.ResultsAccumulation of monocytic MDSCs (M-MDSCs), but not polymorphonuclear MDSCs, in fibrotic livers significantly correlated with reduced tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and increased tumorigenicity in both mouse models. In human HCCs, the tumour-surrounding fibrotic livers were markedly enriched with M-MDSC, with its surrogate marker CD33 significantly associated with aggressive tumour phenotypes and poor survival rates. Mechanistically, activated HSCs induced monocyte-intrinsic p38 MAPK signalling to trigger enhancer reprogramming for M-MDSC development and immunosuppression. Treatment with p38 MAPK inhibitor abrogated HSC-M-MDSC crosstalk to prevent HCC growth. Concomitant with patient-derived M-MDSC suppression by i-BET762, combined treatment with anti-PD-L1 synergistically enhanced TILs, resulting in tumour eradication and prolonged survival in the fibrotic-HCC mouse model.ConclusionOur results signify how non-tumour-intrinsic properties in the desmoplastic microenvironment can be exploited to reinstate immunosurveillance, providing readily translatable combination strategies to empower HCC immunotherapy.
A significant proportion of ductal carcinomas in situ (DCISs) of the breast diagnosed on core biopsies had invasion upon excision. An assessment of various invasion predictors in the biopsies yielded conflicting results. A cohort of 157 cases with needle core biopsy diagnosed with DCISs (including 109 histologically proven DCISs, and 48 cases with invasion upon excision) were evaluated for the numbers of positive and total cores, the percentage of positivity, lobular cancerization, tumor nuclear grade, necrosis, calcification, predominate histological pattern, lymphocytic infiltrate and excisional tumor size. The mean positive core percentage and excisional tumor size were 76% and 2.8 cm for invasive and 66% and 1.9 cm for noninvasive groups. In the biopsy of the invasive group, cancerization of lobules was present in 52%, and nuclear grades 1, 2 and 3 were present in 31, 31 and 38%, respectively. Large comedo and small noncomedo necroses were present in 48 and 10%, whereas large and small calcifications were present in 16 and 21%. Solid, cribriform and papillary patterns were observed in 88, 38 and 21%, respectively. Moderate to marked lymphoid infiltrate was present in 31%. In the biopsy of the noninvasive group, cancerization of lobules was present in 69%, and the nuclear grades 1, 2 and 3 were present in 23, 48 and 29%, respectively. Large comedo and small noncomedo necroses were present in 35 and 11%, whereas large and small calcifications were present in 33 and 23%. Solid, cribriform and papillary patterns were observed in 85, 39 and 9%, respectively. Moderate to marked lymphoid infiltrate was present in 36%. Comparing these groups, a higher positive core percentage, papillary pattern and less cancerization of lobules in the cores and larger excisional tumor size were associated with a higher chance of invasion. Calcification, necrosis and nuclear grade were not significant invasion predictors.
Background The use of macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) to estimate the adequacy of a specimen for histological diagnosis during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition (FNTA) has recently been advocated. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of MOSE compared with conventional EUS-FNTA without rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE). Methods This was an international, multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study. After providing informed consent, consecutive adult patients referred for EUS-FNTA for solid lesions larger than 2 cm were randomized to a MOSE arm or to a conventional arm without ROSE. A designated cytopathologist from each center performed all cytopathological examinations for that center and was blinded to the randomization results. The primary outcome measure was the diagnostic yield, and the secondary outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy, and the rate of procedure-related complications. Results 244 patients (122 conventional, 122 MOSE) were enrolled during the study period. No significant differences between the two arms were found in procedure time or rate of procedure-related adverse events. The diagnostic yield for the MOSE technique (92.6 %) was similar to that for the conventional technique (89.3 %; P = 0.37), with significantly fewer passes made (median: conventional 3, MOSE 2; P < 0.001). Conclusions EUS-FNTA with the MOSE technique provided a similar diagnostic yield to conventional EUS-FNTA technique in the absence of ROSE but with fewer passes. This technique can be used when ROSE is not available.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.