Our results provide the basis for a detailed prospective evaluation of autoimmunity and inflammation in the context of PIDs, with a view to accurately assessing these risks and describing the possible effect of medical intervention.

ObjectivesTo assess efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) as induction therapy, maintenance of remission and treatment of relapses in a cohort of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) patients.MethodsNationwide retrospective multicenter study of IgG4-RD patients treated with at least one course of RTX. Clinical, biological and radiological response, relapse rate and drug tolerance were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted and risk factors for relapse studied with a Cox regression model.ResultsAmong 156 IgG4-RD patients included in the French database, 33 received rituximab. Clinical response was noted in 29/31 (93.5%) symptomatic patients. Glucocorticoids withdrawal was achieved in 17 (51.5%) patients. During a mean follow-up of 24.8 ±21 months, 13/31 (41.9%) responder patients relapsed after a mean delay of 19 ±11 months after RTX. Active disease, as defined by an IgG4-RD Responder Index >9 before RTX, was significantly associated with relapse (HR = 3.68, 95% CI: 1.1, 12.6) (P = 0.04), whereas maintenance therapy with systematic (i.e. before occurrence of a relapse) RTX retreatment was associated with longer relapse-free survival (41 versus 21 months; P = 0.02). Eight severe infections occurred in 4 patients during follow-up (severe infections rate of 12.1/100 patient-years) and hypogammaglobulinemia ≤5 g/l in 3 patients.ConclusionRTX is effective for both induction therapy and treatment of relapses in IgG4-RD, but relapses are frequent after B-cell reconstitution. Maintenance therapy with systematic RTX infusions is associated with longer relapse-free survival and might represent a novel treatment strategy. Yet, the high rate of infections and the temporary effect of RTX might be hindrances to such strategy.

Objective. To analyze the factors associated with response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment and compare the efficacy and safety of infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) in patients with refractory noninfectious uveitis.Methods. This was a multicenter observational study of 160 patients (39% men and 61% women; median age 31 years [interquartile range 21-42]) with uveitis that had been refractory to other therapies, who were treated with anti-TNF (IFX 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, 6, and then every 5-6 weeks [n 5 98] or ADA 40 mg every 2 weeks [n 5 62]). Factors associated with complete response were assessed by multivariate analysis. Efficacy and safety of IFX versus ADA were compared using a propensity score approach with baseline characteristics taken into account. Subdistribution hazard ratios (SHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated.Results. The main etiologies of uveitis included Behçet's disease (BD) (36%), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (22%), spondyloarthropathy (10%), and sarcoidosis (6%). The overall response rate at 6 and 12 months was 87% (26% with complete response) and 93% (28% with complete response), respectively. The median time to complete response was 2 months. In multivariate analysis, BD and occurrence of >5 uveitis flares before anti-TNF initiation were associated with complete response to anti-TNF (SHR 2.52 [95% CI 1.35-4.71], P 5 0.004 and SHR 1.97 [95% CI 1.02-3.84], P 5 0.045, respectively). Side effects were reported in 28% of patients, including serious adverse events in 13%. IFX and ADA did not differ significantly in terms of occurrence of complete response (SHR 0.65 [95% CI 0.25-1.71], P 5 0.39), serious side effects (SHR 0.22 [95% CI

GS differs notably from CVID and B(-) CVID: very late onset, no familial cases, and absence of lymphoid hyperplasia. The key observation is the very high frequency of invasive bacterial infections in GS, an issue that physicians should be aware of.

Key Points• The baseline characteristics of multirefractory ITP differed from "typical" ITP, outcome was severe, and was associated with high morbidity and mortality.• Combining immunosuppressant therapy with a thrombopoietinreceptor agonist may be a relevant option for these patients.Refractory immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) was previously defined as lack of a minimum response to splenectomy and the requirement for long-term treatment to reduce the risk of significant bleeding events. In this multicenter study, we included 37 patients with multirefractory ITP, defined as no response to splenectomy, rituximab, romiplostim, and eltrombopag. As compared with a historical cohort of 183 ITP patients, matched on the calendar year of ITP diagnosis with a 5:1 ratio, patients with multirefractory ITP were more likely to have secondary ITP (odds ratio [OR], 4.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-17.86; P 5 .018) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (OR, 5.94; 95% CI, 1.08-32.48; P 5 .04). The median duration of ITP before being recognized as multirefractory was 78 months (range, 6-450). The patients showed failure of a median of 10.5 prior treatment lines for ITP (range, 6-15). At the end of follow-up (median, 84 months; range, 12-455), only 1/14 patients achieved response with immunosuppressant therapy alone. By contrast, 7/10 patients achieved response with a combination of immunosuppressant therapy and thrombopoietin-receptor agonists that lasted for a median of 15 months (range, 6-32). Throughout the course of ITP, 5/37 patients died, 3 with ITP (bleeding, n 5 2; sepsis n 5 1); 15 (40%) had at least 1 bacterial infection and 9 (24%) at least 1 episode of thrombosis. In conclusion, multirefractory ITP was associated with high morbidity and mortality. Combining an immunosuppressant therapy with thrombopoietin-receptor agonists may be a good strategy for management for these patients with severe disease. (Blood. 2016;128(12):1625-1630