Background in the era of new biological agents it is important to identify patients who may benefit from conventional therapies such as endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) plus long-term local corticosteroids from those with patterns of inflammation that are more difficult to control post-operatively and who may benefit from other therapies. Objective determine if preoperative assessment of type and grade of inflammation and clinical factors can predict disease control with ESS plus long-term local corticosteroids in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Methods Eighty patients treated with ESS plus mometasone-furoate 200 μg BID for CRSwNP and followed for at least 1 year were enrolled (November 2017–December 2018) in this prospective observational study. Type and grade of inflammation were evaluated preoperatively by nasal cytology. Based on cellular pattern, patients were grouped as neutrophilic (n = 20), eosinophilic (n = 38), or mixed eosinophil-neutrophilic (n = 22). SNOT-22 and Lund-Kennedy Endoscopic Score were evaluated at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery and used to define disease control. Results The cumulative probability of remaining free of significant modification of endoscopic score (Lund-Kennedy Endoscopic Score >2) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months was 0.84, 0.76, 0.71, and 0.68, respectively. At 12-month postoperative evaluation good disease control was observed in 54 of 80 patients (67.5%). Compared to those with good post-operative disease control, those with poor control had a significantly higher pre-operative mean count of eosinophils and neutrophils (p < 0.05). The preoperative inflammatory pattern was associated with relative risk of poor control: neutrophilia (RR: 3.10; CI:1.24–7.71), eosinophilia (RR:8.42; CI:2.72–15.12), and mixed eosinophilic and neutrophilic (RR:25.11; CI:19.41–30.01). We also confirmed that asthma, allergy, blood eosinophilia, and ASA triad could predict poor control. Conclusions The type and load of inflammation evaluated preoperatively and selected clinical factors can predict poor control of CRSwNP treated with ESS and local corticosteroids.
PURPOSE: Surgery, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and interventional radiotherapy (IRT, BrachyTherapy BT) are the current therapeutic options for nose vestibule (NV) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). In this article, we evaluate the nose functional parameters of patients affected by SCCs of the NV, primarily treated by interstitial IRT comparing them with healthy controls and with patients treated with intensity-modulated EBRT. METHODS: Ten patients treated by using IRT (group 1), 10 healthy controls and eight patients treated by EBRT (group 2) on the region of the nose were submitted to clinical evaluation (with the NOSE scale score), rhinomanometry, olfactory testing, nasal citology, and evaluation of mucociliary clearance through saccharine test. RESULTS: No long-term skin or cartilaginous toxicity are recorded. The olfactometry threshold discrimination identification TDI is lower in EB group. The mean NOSE scale score was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 and healthy controls ( p ! 0.05). The distribution of cytologic patterns resulted significantly different as well. Patients treated by EB have a significantly impaired mucociliary clearance, with a mean time for the transport of the stained marker, which is more than double in the patients treated by EB than in those treated with IRT ( p ! 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Nasal function and cytological findings are significantly better, substantially preserved, in patients treated by IRT than in those treated by EBRT, bringing new relevant evidence for the establishment of interstitial IRT as the new standard for the treatment of the primary lesion in cT1 and cT2 -Wang staging NV SCCs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.