G-CSF therapy improved survival and clinical recovery in HBV-ACLF. G-CSF therapy also prevented renal failure and hyponatremia. We strongly recommend use of G-CSF therapy in addition to standard medical therapy.

No abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study was to compare the safety and efficacy of tenofovir versus entecavir for treatment of naive acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) (ACLF-B). Methods: Thirty-two patients aged 14-65 years were enrolled in the study. Diagnosis of ACLF was confirmed by clinical condition, biochemical analysis, and virological data. The causes of both chronic liver damages and acute insult in all patients were HBV. They were expressing HBV DNA in the sera, positive for IgM anti-HBc, had increased levels of serum bilirubin, compromised prothrombin time; and more than 50% patients had encephalopathy. The standard dose of tenofovir and entecavir was given. Results: The antiviral effects of tenofovir and entecavir were evident as most patients became negative for HBV DNA in the sera after 90 days of therapy. Also, the levels of serum bilirubin, CTP (Child-Turcotte-Pugh) and MELD (model for end-stage liver disease) score exhibited significant improvement due to antiviral therapy. Although the improvement of liver functions, and liver damages were detected in patients receiving both tenofovir and entecavir, the survival of the patients was significantly higher in those receiving tenofovir compared to entecavir-treated patients. Conclusion: This prospective study with limited number patients provides a challenge to assess the real potential of tenofovir over entecavir as therapeutic option for ACLF-B by conducting a multicenter clinical trial enrolling patient of different races and background.

No abstract

Objectives: Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is thought to be a hepatic manifestation of Metabolic Syndrome (MS) or Insulin Resistance (IR). The aim of the study was to explore the clinical, anthropometric, metabolic, biochemical and histological profile of NAFLD patients without IR by comparing it with NAFLD with IR. Methods: Total 851 patients with sonographic evidence of fatty liver were included. These patients underwent clinical, anthropometric, biochemical and histological evaluation. IR was calculated using the homeostatic model assessment. Liver biopsy done in 285 patients who consented for the procedure and who had MS or raised ALT. Results: Among 851 NAFLD patients, 561(65.9%) patients were without IR and 290 (34.1%) patients were with IR. The proportion of male sex [230 (41.0%) vs. 89 (30.7%); P = 0.046] were higher but diabetes [19.10% vs. 39.0%; P = 0.000] and MS were [58.80%vs. 78.10%; P = 0.014] significantly lower in non IR group. Body Mass Index (BMI) kg/m 2 and Waist Circumference (WC) in cm were also lower in non IR group: [26.6 AE 3.5 vs. 27.9 AE 4.3; P = 0.002] and [93.3 AE 8.4 vs. 95.9 AE 8.4; P = .003]. Lipid profile, ALT, AST and ALP were not differed between the groups. Histopathology reports revealed that lobular inflammation, ballooning and fibrosis were similar in two groups, only steatosis score was higher in IR group [2.0 AE 0.7 vs. 1.8 AE 0.8; P = 0.007]. Conclusion: There are significant proportion of NAFLD patients without IR in Bangladesh. NAFLD patients without IR predominantly male, had lower BMI, WC, MS and diabetes. Histologically NAFLD without IR equally severe with ballooning, lobular inflammation and fibrosis except steatosis. Insulin resistance is the principal but not the sole factor for NAFLD in our population.