Staphylococcus haemolyticus is the most common organism among clinical isolatesof methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Aim: This study evaluated the ability to produce biofilm with the presence of the antibiotics (1/4 minimum inhibitory concentrations) of S. haemolyticus strains isolated from blood culture. Methods: Clonal distribution was assessed in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. PCR assays were performed to detect mecA, icaA, aap, atlE, atl, fbp genes. S. haemolyticus strains grown in the presence of the antibiotics were investigated for biofilm formation on glass, polystyrene and catheter surfaces. Results: Biofilm formation was independent of the presence of the icaA and mecA genes, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type. Vancomycin, oxacillin, moxifloxacin, rifampicin, teicoplanin, tigecycline and linezolid did not inhibit biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the biofilm formation process is complex and may not be related to ica gene carriage. Furthermore, in this study the biofilm formation was increased in the presence of antimicrobial agents.
Background Bacterial biofilm on surfaces of mammary implants is a predisposing factor for several outcomes. Since Gram-positive bacteria are potential agents of biomaterial-associated infections (BAIs), their abilities to form biofilm on breast implants should be elucidated. Objectives To evaluate biofilm formation on different mammary prosthesis surfaces by major Gram-positive bacterial pathogens involved in BAIs. Methods We initially evaluated biofilm formation on polystyrene plates with and without fibrinogen or collagen for one reference strain and one clinical isolate of Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Streptococcus pyogenes. We also tested the ability of clinical isolates to form biofilm on four different implant surfaces: polyurethane foam and smooth, microtextured and standard textured silicone. Biofilm structure and cell viability were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Results All strains showed strong biofilm formation on polystyrene. After fibrinogen or collagen treatment, biofilm formation varied. With fibrinogen, reference strains of S. aureus and S. pyogenes increased biofilm formation (p<0.05). Reference strains of all species and the clinical isolate of S. pyogenes increased biofilm formation after collagen treatment (p<0.05). In general, S. aureus showed higher capacity to produce biofilm. SEM showed biofilm attached to all surfaces tested, with the presence of extracellular polymeric substances and voids. Viable cells were more frequent for E. faecalis and S. pyogenes. Conclusions All species produced biofilm on all prosthesis surfaces and under different conditions. Micrographies indicated thicker bacterial biofilm formation on microtextured and/or standard textured silicone by all species, except E. faecalis.
Studies related to bacterial biofilm formation are extremely relevant because of their constant association with several human diseases. The organization of this sessile microbial community provides protection against opsonization and phagocytosis. It is responsible for hampering not only the immune system performance against infections but also antimicrobial activity. Staphylococcus aureus is part of healthy human microbiota including skin and nasal vestibule. However, many strains have become opportunistic pathogens because of the ability of biofilm formation in implants and medical devices by using them as route of access to bloodstream. S. aureus’ ability of biofilm formation is widely known and it has been responsible for several infections, such as endocarditis, bacteremia and sepsis. Several factors contribute to biofilm formation including expression of specific genes and interaction between proteins involved in adhesion to substrate. This work aims to explore the main aspects related to biofilm formation by S. aureus, using tools as data index bases from the scientific literature: Google Scholar, LILACS, MEDLINE (PubMed), SciELO, Scopus and Book/eBook, between July 2018 and February 2019, in English, Spanish and Portuguese. This review aims to provide a better understanding of biofilm formation and its impact on host health.
Introduction: The use of antibiotics in humans, animal husbandry and veterinary activities induces selective pressure leading to the colonization and infection by resistant strains.Objective: We evaluated water samples collected from rivers of the Guanabara Bay, which have suffered minor and major environmental degradation, and clinical samples of hospital origin to detect evidence of the presence of resistance genes to aminoglycosides, beta-lactam antibiotics and fluoroquinolones in strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae, K. pneumoniae subsp. ozaenae and Escherichia coli.Materials and methods: For isolation of the water strains we employed culture media containing 32 μg/ml cephalotin and 8 μg/ml gentamicin. The strains from clinical materials were selected using culture media containing 8 μg/ml gentamicin. The strains were identified and subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), plasmid DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect genes encoding enzymes modifying aminoglycosides (EMA), extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) and plasmid mechanisms of quinolone resistance (PMQR).Results: The AST of the isolates recovered from water samples showed multidrugresistance profiles similar to those found in isolates recovered from clinical materials. All isolates from water samples and 90% of the isolates from clinical samples showed at least one plasmid band. In the PCR assays, 7.4% of the isolates recovered from water samples and 20% of those from clinical materials showed amplification products for the three antimicrobial classes.Conclusion: We believe that the detection of microorganisms presenting genetic elements in environments such as water is necessary for the prevention and control of their dissemination with potential to infect humans and other animals in eventual contact with these environments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.