Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) constitutes a diverse group of malignancies emerging in the biliary tree. CCAs are divided into three subtypes depending on their anatomical site of origin: intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar (pCCA) and distal (dCCA) CCA 1,2 (Fig. 1). Of note, considered as an independent entity, mixed HCC-CCA tumours are a rare type of liver malignancy sharing features of both iCCA and HCC and presenting an aggressive disease course and poor prognosis 3,4. iCCAs arise above the second-order bile ducts, whereas the point of anatomical distinction between pCCA and dCCA is the insertion of the cystic duct. pCCA and dCCA can also be collectively referred to as 'extrahepatic' (eCCA) 5. In the USA, pCCA is the single largest group, accounting for approximately 50-60% of all CCAs, followed by dCCA (20-30%) and iCCA (10-20%) 1,6,7. CCA is the second most common primary hepatic malignancy after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), comprising approximately 15% of all primary liver tumours and 3% of gastrointestinal cancers 1,6,7. CCAs are usually asymptomatic in early stages and, therefore, often diagnosed when the disease is already in advanced stages, which highly compromises therapeutic options, resulting in a dismal prognosis 1,8. CCA is a rare cancer, but its incidence (0.3-6 per 100,000 inhabitants per year) 1 and mortality (1-6 per 100,000 inhabitants per year, globally 9 , not taking into account specific regions with incidence >6 per 100,000 habitants such as South Korea, China and Thailand) have been increasing in the past few decades worldwide, representing a global health problem. Despite advances in

PURPOSE Preoperative chemoradiotherapy may improve the radical resection rate for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, but the overall benefit is unproven. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized phase III trial in 16 centers, patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy, which consisted of 3 courses of gemcitabine, the second combined with 15 × 2.4 Gy radiotherapy, followed by surgery and 4 courses of adjuvant gemcitabine or to immediate surgery and 6 courses of adjuvant gemcitabine. The primary end point was overall survival by intention to treat. RESULTS Between April 2013 and July 2017, 246 eligible patients were randomly assigned; 119 were assigned to preoperative chemoradiotherapy and 127 to immediate surgery. Median overall survival by intention to treat was 16.0 months with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and 14.3 months with immediate surgery (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.05; P = .096). The resection rate was 61% and 72% ( P = .058). The R0 resection rate was 71% (51 of 72) in patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy and 40% (37 of 92) in patients assigned to immediate surgery ( P < .001). Preoperative chemoradiotherapy was associated with significantly better disease-free survival and locoregional failure-free interval as well as with significantly lower rates of pathologic lymph nodes, perineural invasion, and venous invasion. Survival analysis of patients who underwent tumor resection and started adjuvant chemotherapy showed improved survival with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (35.2 v 19.8 months; P = .029). The proportion of patients who suffered serious adverse events was 52% versus 41% ( P = .096). CONCLUSION Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer did not show a significant overall survival benefit. Although the outcomes of the secondary end points and predefined subgroup analyses suggest an advantage of the neoadjuvant approach, additional evidence is required.

Summary Background Thirty-five percent of pancreatic cancer patients have unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) at diagnosis. Several studies have evaluated systemic chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX for patients with LAPC. We report a patient-level meta-analysis of LAPC patients treated with FOLFIRINOX as first-line treatment. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in Embase, Medline (ovidSP), Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed Publisher, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. Studies evaluating FOLFIRINOX as first-line treatment for LAPC were included. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcomes included progression free survival (PFS), and grade 3 or 4 adverse events. We collected patient-level data from all studies that reported survival outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival outcomes. Grade 3 or 4 adverse event rates and the percentage of subsequent (chemo)radiation or resection in eligible studies were pooled in a random effects model. Findings Thirteen eligible studies representing 689 patients were included of whom 355 had LAPC. Eleven studies, representing 315 LAPC patients, reported survival outcomes and were eligible for patient-level meta-analysis. The median OS ranged from 10·0 to 32·7 months across studies with a patient-level median OS of 24·2 months [95% CI: 21·6 - 26·8 months]. The median PFS ranged from 3·0 to 20·4 months across studies with a patient-level median PFS of 15·0 months [95% CI: 13·8 – 16·2 months]. In 10 studies representing 490 patients, 296 Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported (i.e. 60·4 events per 100 patients). No death was attributed to FOLFIRINOX toxicity. Subsequent treatments included (chemo)radiation (63·5%) and surgical resection (25·9%). Interpretation Patients with LAPC treated with FOLFIRINOX had a median OS of 24·2 months that is far superior to previously reported OS with gemcitabine. Future research should evaluate these promising results in a randomized controlled trial and determine which patients might benefit from (chemo)radiation or a resection after FOLFIRINOX.

BackgroundStudies comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer may report only patients who underwent resection and so survival will be skewed. The aim of this study was to report survival by intention to treat in a comparison of upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant treatment in resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.MethodsMEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting median overall survival by intention to treat in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer treated with or without neoadjuvant treatment. Secondary outcomes included overall and R0 resection rate, pathological lymph node rate, reasons for unresectability and toxicity of neoadjuvant treatment.ResultsIn total, 38 studies were included with 3484 patients, of whom 1738 (49·9 per cent) had neoadjuvant treatment. The weighted median overall survival by intention to treat was 18·8 months for neoadjuvant treatment and 14·8 months for upfront surgery; the difference was larger among patients whose tumours were resected (26·1 versus 15·0 months respectively). The overall resection rate was lower with neoadjuvant treatment than with upfront surgery (66·0 versus 81·3 per cent; P < 0·001), but the R0 rate was higher (86·8 (95 per cent c.i. 84·6 to 88·7) versus 66·9 (64·2 to 69·6) per cent; P < 0·001). Reported by intention to treat, the R0 rates were 58·0 and 54·9 per cent respectively (P = 0·088). The pathological lymph node rate was 43·8 per cent after neoadjuvant therapy and 64·8 per cent in the upfront surgery group (P < 0·001). Toxicity of at least grade III was reported in up to 64 per cent of the patients.ConclusionNeoadjuvant treatment appears to improve overall survival by intention to treat, despite lower overall resection rates for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016049374.

PURPOSE The benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer remains controversial. Initial results of the PREOPANC trial failed to demonstrate a statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit. The long-term results are reported. METHODS In this multicenter, phase III trial, patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or upfront surgery in 16 Dutch centers. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy consisted of three cycles of gemcitabine combined with 36 Gy radiotherapy in 15 fractions during the second cycle. After restaging, patients underwent surgery followed by four cycles of adjuvant gemcitabine. Patients in the upfront surgery group underwent surgery followed by six cycles of adjuvant gemcitabine. The primary outcome was OS by intention-to-treat. No safety data were collected beyond the initial report of the trial. RESULTS Between April 24, 2013, and July 25, 2017, 246 eligible patients were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (n = 119) and upfront surgery (n = 127). At a median follow-up of 59 months, the OS was better in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group than in the upfront surgery group (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.96; P = .025). Although the difference in median survival was only 1.4 months (15.7 months v 14.3 months), the 5-year OS rate was 20.5% (95% CI, 14.2 to 29.8) with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and 6.5% (95% CI, 3.1 to 13.7) with upfront surgery. The effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was consistent across the prespecified subgroups, including resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant gemcitabine improves OS compared with upfront surgery and adjuvant gemcitabine in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.