The current findings completely affirm the validity of our original observations indicating the appropriateness of grouping primary breast cancer patients into those with negative, 1 to 3, or ≫4 positive nodes. Results, however, reveal that there is a risk in combining all patients with ≫4 positive nodes into a single group. Since there was a 25% greater disease‐free survival and an 18% greater survival in those with 4 to 6 than in those with ≫13 positive axillary nodes, such a unification may provide misleading information regarding patient prognosis, as well as the worth of a therapeutic regimen when compared with another from a putatively similar patient population. Of particular interest were findings relating the conditional probability, i.e., the hazard rate, of a treatment failure or death each year during the 5‐year period following operation to nodal involvement with tumor. Whereas the hazard rate for those with negative, or 1 to 3 positive nodes, was relatively low and constant, in those with ≫4 positive nodes the risk in the early years was much greater, but by the fifth year it was similar to that occurring when 1‐3 nodes were involved, and not much different from negative node patients. The same pattern existed whether 4 to 6 or ≫13 nodes were positive. When the current findings are considered relative to other factors with predictive import, it is concluded that nodal status still remains the primary prognostic discriminant.

We studied the possibility that the addition of tamoxifen to L-phenylalanine mustard combined with 5-fluorouracil enhances the benefit from the latter two drugs that has been observed in women with primary breast cancer and positive axillary nodes. Recurrence of disease was reduced at two years in patients given the three-drug regimen whose tumor estrogen-receptor levels were greater than or equal to 10 fmol. Among patients greater than or equal to 50 years old treatment failure was significantly reduced (P less than 0.001): by 51 per cent in those with one to three positive nodes and by 64 per cent in those with four or more. Higher receptor levels were associated with a greater probability of disease-free survival. Patients less than or equal to 49 years old were less responsive: those with one to three positive nodes received no benefit from tamoxifen at any receptor level, whereas those with four or more appeared to have reduced treatment failure associated with higher receptor levels. This adjuvant chemotherapy is not indicated in patients less than or equal to 49 years old whose tumor receptor levels are below 10 fmol; there is a suggestion of benefit in patients greater than or equal to 50 years old whose levels are low.

In 1971, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) implemented a prospective randomized clinical trial to compare the worth of alternative treatments with radical mastectomy in women with primary operable breast cancer. Information has been obtained from 1,665 patients eligible for follow-up from 34 NSABP member institutions in Canada and the United States. Results from that trial, at present in its sixth year with patients on study for an average of 36 months, (26 to 62 months), fail to demonstrate an advantage for those who had a radical mastectomy. No significant difference in the treatment failure or survival has as yet been observed in clinically negative node patients who have been randomly managed by conventional radical mastectomy, total mastectomy with postoperative regional radiation or total mastectomy followed by axillary dissection of those patients who subsequently develop positive nodes. Similarly, there presently exists no difference between patients with clinically positive nodes treated by radical mastectomy o r by total mastectomy followed by radiation. Of particular interest is the observation that based upon findings from radical mastectomy patients, there may be as many as 40% of patients having a total mastectomy who had histologically positive nodes unremoved, to date only 15% have developed positive nodes requiring a n axillary dissection. The persistence of such a difference in incidence would have profound biological significance. The discovery that leaving behind positive axillary nodes has as yet not been influential in enhancing the incidence of distant metastases o r the overall proportion of treatment failures and that a disproportionate number of treatment failures in the total mastectomy group occurred in those patients who subsequently required axillary dissection provides reinforcement to the view that positive axillary lymph nodes are not the predecessor of distant tumor spread but are a manifestation of disseminated disease.comer 39:2827-2839,1977. HERE HAS EXISTED GREAT CONTROVERSYtional Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project T concerning the treatment of primary breast (NSABP), after almost a decade of planning cancer. Prompted by that uncertainty, the Na-initiated in August of 1971, a prospective ran-