Serial analysis of chimerism reliably identifies patients at highest risk to relapse. The 3-year EFS of patients with increasing MC without immunotherapy was 0%, by which overt relapse could be prevented in a considerable group of patients.
Although the gene defects for several mouse mutants with severe osteopetrosis are known, the genes underlying human infantile malignant recessive osteopetrosis remain elusive. Osteopetrosis is thought to be caused by a defect in osteoclast function. These cells degrade bone material in a tightly sealed extracellular compartment that is acidified by a vacuolar (V)-type H(+)-ATPase. Genes encoding components of the acidification machinery are candidate genes for osteopetrosis. In five of ten patients with infantile malignant osteopetrosis, we now demonstrate five different mutations in OC116, the gene encoding the a3 subunit of the V-ATPase from osteoclasts. Two independent patients were homozygous for mutations that predict a total loss of function by severely truncating the protein. By affecting a splice site, another homozygous mutation deletes 14 amino acids within the N-terminus, which interacts with other subunits of the proton pump. On the other hand, in four patients no mutations were found, and one patient from a consanguineous family did not show homozygosity at the OC116 locus, suggesting that mutations in at least one different gene may underlie osteopetrosis. Our work shows that mutations in the gene encoding the a3 subunit of the proton pump are a rather common cause of infantile osteopetrosis and suggests that this disease is genetically heterogeneous.
Key Points• Dexamethasone vs prednisone in induction of pediatric ALL led to significant relapse reduction and increased treatment-related mortality.• No overall survival benefit was achieved with dexamethasone except in the subset of patients with T-cell ALL and good early treatment response.Induction therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) traditionally includes prednisone; yet, dexamethasone may have higher antileukemic potency, leading to fewer relapses and improved survival. After a 7-day prednisone prephase, 3720 patients enrolled on trial Associazione Italiana di Ematologia e Oncologia Pediatrica and BerlinFrankfurt-Münster (AIEOP-BFM) ALL 2000 were randomly selected to receive either dexamethasone (10 mg/m 2 per day) or prednisone (60 mg/m 2 per day) for 3 weeks plus tapering in induction. The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (6 standard error) was 10.8 6 0.7% in the dexamethasone and 15.6 6 0.8% in the prednisone group (P < .0001), showing the largest effect on extramedullary relapses. The benefit of dexamethasone was partially counterbalanced by a significantly higher induction-related death rate (2.5% vs 0.9%, P 5 .00013), resulting in 5-year event-free survival rates of 83.9 6 0.9% for dexamethasone and 80.8 6 0.9% for prednisone (P 5 .024). No difference was seen in 5-year overall survival (OS) in the total cohort (dexamethasone, 90.3 6 0.7%; prednisone, 90.5 6 0.7%). Retrospective analyses of predefined subgroups revealed a significant survival benefit from dexamethasone only for patients with T-cell ALL and good response to the prednisone prephase (prednisone good-response [PGR]) (dexamethasone, 91.4 6 2.4%; prednisone, 82.6 6 3.2%; P 5 .036). In patients with precursor B-cell ALL and PGR, survival after relapse was found to be significantly worse if patients were previously assigned to the dexamethasone arm. We conclude that, for patients with PGR in the large subgroup of precursor B-cell ALL, dexamethasone especially reduced the incidence of better salvageable relapses, resulting in inferior survival after relapse. This explains the lack of benefit from dexamethasone in overall survival that we observed in the total cohort except in the subset of T-cell ALL patients with PGR. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.