A B S T R A C T PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of a psychoeducational intervention in improving cancer-related fatigue. Patients and MethodsThis randomized controlled trial involved 109 women commencing adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I or II breast cancer in five chemotherapy treatment centers. Intervention group patients received an individualized fatigue education and support program delivered in the clinic and by phone over three 10-to 20-minute sessions 1 week apart. Instruments included a numeric rating scale assessing confidence with managing fatigue; 11-point numeric rating scales measuring fatigue at worst, average, and best; the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue and Piper Fatigue Scales; the Cancer Self-Efficacy Scale; the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30; and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. For each outcome, separate analyses of covariance of change scores between baseline (T1) and the three follow-up time points (T2, T3, and T4) were conducted, controlling for the variable's corresponding baseline value. ResultsCompared with the intervention group, mean difference scores between the baseline (T1) and immediate after the test (T2) assessments increased significantly more for the control group for worst and average fatigue, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue, and Piper fatigue severity and interference measures. These differences were not observed between baseline and T3 and T4 assessments. No significant differences were identified for any pre-or post-test change scores for confidence with managing fatigue, cancer selfefficacy, anxiety, depression, or quality of life. ConclusionPreparatory education and support has the potential to assist women to cope with cancer-related fatigue in the short term. However, further research is needed to identify ways to improve the potency and sustainability of psychoeducational interventions for managing cancer-related fatigue.

The value of multiple frequency bioelectric impedence analysis (MFBIA) in the monitoring and management of post-mastectomy lymphoedema of the arm was evaluated in 15 patients and controls. The technique was found to produce quantitative agreement with a clinical diagnosis of lymphoedema and with the currently-used measure (limb volume calculated from circumferential measurements) of limb size. The significance of this finding lies in MFBIA being diagnostically informative: it indicates when an observed change in limb volume is directly, albeit theoretically, attributable to accumulation of extracellular fluid. MFBIA potentially offers the means for earlier definitive diagnosis and more-accurate monitoring of extracellular fluid changes during and after treatment.