Many patients with non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) live far from the closest nephrologist; although reversible, this might constitute a barrier to optimal care. In order to evaluate outcomes, we selected 31,452 outpatients older than 18 years with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 45 ml/min per 1.73 m² who had serum creatinine measured at least once during 2005 in Alberta, Canada. We then used logistic regression to examine the association between outcomes of 6545 patients who lived more than 50 km from the nearest nephrologist. Over a median follow-up of 27 months, 7684 participants died and 15,075 were hospitalized at least once. Compared with those living within 50 km, those further away were significantly less likely to visit a nephrologist or a multidisciplinary CKD clinic within 18 months of the index measurement of the eGFR. Similarly, remote dwellers with diabetes were significantly less likely to have hemoglobin A1c evaluated within 1 year of the index eGFR measurement, to have urinary albumin assessed biannually, or to receive an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or receptor blocker in the setting of diabetes or proteinuria. Remote-dwelling participants were also significantly more likely to die or be hospitalized during follow-up than those living closer. Thus, among people with CKD, remote dwellers were less likely to receive specialist care, recommended laboratory testing, and appropriate medications, and were more likely to die or be hospitalized compared with those living closer to a nephrologist.

Background: Primary care networks are a newer model of primary care that focuses on improved access to care and the use of multidisciplinary teams for patients with chronic disease. We sought to determine the association between enrolment in primary care networks and the care and outcomes of patients with diabetes. Methods:We used administrative health care data to study the care and outcomes of patients with incident and prevalent diabetes separately. For patients with prevalent diabetes, we compared those whose care was managed by physicians who were or were not in a primary care network using propensity score matching. For patients with incident diabetes, we studied a cohort before and after primary care networks were established. Each cohort was further divided based on whether or not patients were cared for by physicians enrolled in a network. Our primary outcome was admissions to hospital or visits to emergency departments for ambulatory care sensitive conditions specific to diabetes. Results:Compared with patients whose prevalent diabetes is managed outside of primary care networks, patients in primary care networks had a lower rate of diabetes-specific ambulatory care sensitive conditions (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 to 0.87), were more likely to see an ophthalmologist or optometrist (risk ratio 1.19, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.21) and had better glycemic control (adjusted mean difference -0.067, 95% CI -0.081 to -0.052).Interpretation: Patients whose diabetes was managed in primary care networks received better care and had better clinical outcomes than patients whose condition was not managed in a network, although the differences were very small. AbstractResearch CMAJ, February 7, 2012, 184(2) E145