No abstract

This case series describes several patients with cardiac conduction abnormalities and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias temporally related to loperamide abuse. With the recent efforts to restrict the diversion of prescription opioids, increasing abuse of loperamide as an opioid substitute may be seen. Toxicologists should be aware of these risks and we urge all clinicians to report such cases to FDA Medwatch(®).

Safety concerns regarding cobalt-containing metal alloy hip prosthetics (Co-HP) have resulted in product recalls, a medical device alert, and issuance of guidance for clinicians. Recently, cases of suspected prosthetic hip-associated cobalt toxicity (PHACT) from Co-HP have been reported. Although little is known about suspected PHACT, these patients may be referred to medical toxicologists for evaluation and management recommendations. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and unpublished abstracts from toxicology scientific meetings for references relevant to PHACT. Authors independently screened publications for inclusion criteria: publication in English, human study population, subject(s) are symptomatic (except for isolated hip pain), and cobalt values in any matrix (blood, serum, urine, CSF, synovial fluid) available for review. Data from 10 cases are reviewed. Patients with suspected PHACT had findings consistent with cobalt toxicity, including thyroid, cardiac, and neurologic dysfunction.Signs and symptoms appeared between 3 and 72 months after arthroplasty (median 19 months). Neurologic symptoms were most common. Ancillary testing varied considerably. All patients had elevated cobalt levels in one or more matrices. Enhanced elimination was attempted in 27 % of patients. At this time, the information currently available regarding patients with suspected PHACT is inadequate to guide clinical decision making. No consensus has been reached regarding the management of Co-HP patients with systemic symptoms. Indications for chelation have not been established and require further study. Improved case definitions, improved surveillance, and controlled studies are needed to elucidate the scope of this problem and guide future investigations.

Objectives Opioid pain reliever (OPR) prescribing at Emergency Department (ED) discharge has increased in the past decade but specific prescription details are lacking. Prior ED OPR prescribing estimates relied on national survey extrapolation or prescription databases. The main goal of this study was to utilize a research consortium to analyze the characteristics of patients and opioid prescriptions using a national sample of ED patients. We also aimed to examine the indications for OPR prescribing, characteristics of opioids prescribed both in the ED and at the time of discharge, and characteristics of patients who received OPRs compared with those who did not. Methods This observational, multi-centered, retrospective cohort study assessed OPR prescribing to consecutive patients presenting to the consortium EDs during 1 week in October 2012. The consortium study sites consisted of 19 EDs representing 1.4 million annual visits, varied geographically, and were predominantly academic centers. Medical records of all patients aged 18-90 years discharged with an OPR (excluding tramadol) were individually abstracted via standardized chart review by investigators for detailed analysis. Descriptive statistics were generated. Results During the study week, 27,516 patient visits were evaluated in the consortium EDs. 19,321 (70.2%) were discharged and 3,284 patients (11.9% of all patients and 17.0% of discharged patients) received an OPR prescription. For those prescribed an OPR, mean age was 41.1 (SD 14.7) years and 1,694 (51.6%) were female. Mean initial pain score was 7.7 (SD 2.4). The most common diagnoses associated with OPR prescribing were back pain (10.2%), abdominal pain (10.1%), and extremity fracture (7.1%) or sprain (6.5%). The most common OPRs prescribed were oxycodone (52.3%), hydrocodone (40.9%) and codeine (4.8%). >99% were immediate release, 90.0% were combination preparations, and the mean and median number of pills was 16.6 (SD 7.6) and 15 (IQR=12-20) respectively. Conclusion In a study of ED patients treated over a single week across the country, 17% of discharged patients were prescribed OPRs. The majority of the prescriptions had small pill counts and almost exclusively immediate release formulations.