Although it has been more than 2 years since the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, COVID-19 continues to be a worldwide health crisis. Despite the development of preventive vaccines, therapies to treat COVID-19 and other inflammatory diseases remain a major unmet need in medicine. Our study sought to identify drivers of disease severity and mortality to develop tailored immunotherapy strategies to halt disease progression. We assembled the Mount Sinai COVID-19 Biobank, which was composed of almost 600 hospitalized patients followed longitudinally through the peak of the pandemic in 2020. Moderate disease and survival were associated with a stronger antigen presentation and effector T cell signature. In contrast, severe disease and death were associated with an altered antigen presentation signature, increased numbers of inflammatory immature myeloid cells, and extrafollicular activated B cells that have been previously associated with autoantibody formation. In severely ill patients with COVID-19, lung tissue–resident alveolar macrophages not only were drastically depleted but also had an altered antigen presentation signature, which coincided with an influx of inflammatory monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages. In addition, we found that the size of the alveolar macrophage pool correlated with patient outcome and that alveolar macrophage numbers and functionality were restored to homeostasis in patients who recovered from COVID-19. These data suggest that local and systemic myeloid cell dysregulation are drivers of COVID-19 severity and modulation of alveolar macrophage numbers and activity in the lung may be a viable therapeutic strategy for the treatment of critical inflammatory lung diseases.

Purpose:The treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) poses challenges. The use of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has been disappointing as GBM is characterized by low mutational burden and low T-cell infiltration. The combination of ICI with other treatment modalities may improve efficacy. Patients and Methods:Patients with recurrent GBM were treated with avelumab, a human IgG1 antibody directed against PD-L1 (part A), or avelumab within a week after laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and continuation of avelumab (part B). Bevacizumab was allowed to be combined with ICI to spare steroid use. The primary objective was to characterize the tolerability and safety of the regimens. The secondary objectives included overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), signatures of plasma analytes, and immune cells. Results:A total of 12 patients (median age 64, range 37-73) enrolled, five in part A and seven in part B. Two serious adverse events occurred in the same patient, LITT treated, not leading to death. The median survival (OS) from enrollment was 13 months [95% CI, 4-16 months] with no differences for Part A or B. The median PFS was three months [95% CI, 1.5-4.5 months]. The decrease in MICA/MICB, gamma-delta T cells, and CD4+ T cell EMRA correlated with prolonged survival. Conclusions:Avelumab was generally well-tolerated. Adding bevacizumab to ICI may be beneficial by lowering cytokine and immune cell expression. The development of this combinatorial treatment warrants further investigation. Exploring the modulation of adaptive and innate immune cells and plasma analytes as biomarker signatures may instruct future studies in this dismal refractory disease.

<div>Purpose:<p>The treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) poses challenges. The use of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has been disappointing as GBM is characterized by low mutational burden and low T-cell infiltration. The combination of ICI with other treatment modalities may improve efficacy.</p>Patient and Methods:<p>Patients with recurrent GBM were treated with avelumab, a human IgG1 antibody directed against PD-L1 (part A), or avelumab within a week after laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and continuation of avelumab (part B). Bevacizumab was allowed to be combined with ICI to spare steroid use. The primary objective was to characterize the tolerability and safety of the regimens. The secondary objectives included overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), signatures of plasma analytes, and immune cells.</p>Results:<p>A total of 12 patients (median age 64; range, 37–73) enrolled, five in part A and seven in part B. Two serious adverse events occurred in the same patient, LITT treated, not leading to death. The median survival from enrollment was 13 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4–16 months] with no differences for part A or B. The median PFS was 3 months (95% CI, 1.5–4.5 months). The decrease in MICA/MICB, γδT cells, and CD4⁺ T cell EMRA correlated with prolonged survival.</p>Conclusions:<p>Avelumab was generally well tolerated. Adding bevacizumab to ICI may be beneficial by lowering cytokine and immune cell expression. The development of this combinatorial treatment warrants further investigation. Exploring the modulation of adaptive and innate immune cells and plasma analytes as biomarker signatures may instruct future studies in this dismal refractory disease.</p>Significance:<p>Our phase I of PD-L1 inhibition combined with LITT and using bevacizumab to spare steroids had a good safety profile for recurrent GBM. Developing combinatory treatment may help outcomes. In addition, we found significant immune modulation of cytokines and immune cells by bevacizumab, which may enhance the effect of ICI.</p></div>

<p>One-way ANOVA analysis comparing expression of cytokines between Avelumab treated and Avelumab combined with Bevacizumab</p>