ObjectiveTo examine whether rituximab induction followed by glatiramer acetate (GA) monotherapy is more effective than GA alone for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis with active disease.MethodsThis was a single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Fifty-five participants were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to either rituximab (R-GA) or placebo (P-GA) induction, followed by GA therapy initiated in all participants. Participants were followed up to 3 years. The primary endpoint was the number of participants with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA): those without relapse, new MRI lesions, and sustained change in disability.ResultsTwenty-eight and 27 participants received rituximab and placebo induction, respectively, with one participant in each arm withdrawing before 6-month MRI. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. At end of study, 44.44% of R-GA participants demonstrated NEDA vs 19.23% of P-GA participants (p = 0.049). Treatment failed for a smaller proportion of R-GA participants (37.04% R-GA vs 69.23% P-GA, p = 0.019), and time to treatment failure was longer (23.32 months R-GA vs 11.29 months P-GA, p = 0.027). Fewer participants in the R-GA arm had new lesions (25.93% R-GA vs 61.54% P-GA, p = 0.009), and there were fewer new T2 lesions (0.48 R-GA vs 1.96 P-GA, p = 0.027). Probability of demonstrating NEDA in the R-GA arm returned to baseline within the study period. There were no differences in adverse events.ConclusionsInduction therapy with rituximab followed by GA may provide superior efficacy in the short term than GA alone in relapsing multiple sclerosis, but this benefit appears to wane within the study period. Larger studies are needed to assess sustainability of results.ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT01569451.

ObjectiveBrain atrophy has been correlated with objective cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis but few studies have explored self-reported subjective cognitive concerns and their relationship to brain volume changes. This study explores the relationship between subjective cognitive concerns in multiple sclerosis and reduced brain volume in regions of interest implicated in cognitive dysfunction.MethodsA total of 158 patients with multiple sclerosis completed the Quality of Life in Neurologic Disorders Measures (Neuro-QoL) short forms to assess subjective cognitive concerns and underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging. Regional brain volumes from regions of interest implicated in cognitive dysfunction were measured using NeuroQuant automated volumetric quantitation. Linear regression was used to analyze the relationship between subjective cognitive concerns and brain volume.ResultsControlling for age, disease duration, gender, depression and fatigue, increased subjective cognitive concerns were associated with reduced thalamic volume (standardized β = 0.223, t150 =2.406, P = 0.017) and reduced cortical gray matter volume (standardized β = 0.240, t150 = 2.777, P = 0.006). Increased subjective cognitive concerns were not associated with any other regions of interest that were analyzed.ConclusionsSubjective cognitive concern in MS is associated with reduced thalamic and cortical gray matter volumes, areas of the brain that have been implicated in objective cognitive impairment. These findings may lend neuroanatomical significance to subjective cognitive concerns and patient-reported outcomes as measured by Neuro-QoL.

Background: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures have been shown to be effective for tracking treatment outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, collecting PROs as part of the clinical standard of care can be time-consuming and examination of their validity for use in an MS sample has been limited. Objective: To determine the discriminant validity of the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL TM) short forms in a real-world MS clinic population. Design/Methods: Neuro-QoL is a series of questionnaires for tracking physical function, emotional/ cognitive health, and social abilities in clinical populations. Neuro-QoL data from 902 MS patients were analyzed for psychometric properties and factor structure. Results: Neuro-QoL demonstrated acceptable reliability in the moderate-to-good ranges. Moderate support for convergent validity was observed with other measures of MS quality of life, disease severity, and symptoms. However, results from a confirmatory factor analysis suggested poor model fit for most of the 12 domains tested. Conclusions: These findings support the utility of some of the Neuro-QoL questionnaires in evaluating MS-related PROs. However, additional research may help abridge and strengthen these measures for use in this population.