No abstract

Data assessing the diagnostic accuracies of use of different respiratory samples for the detection of the novel influenza A/H1N1 2009 virus by molecular methods are lacking. The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity of combined nose and throat swabs (CNTS) with that of nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPA). This was a prospective study of adults and children with suspected influenza. Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR testing was used for the virological diagnosis. Of the 2,473 patients included, 264 with paired CNTS and NPA were randomly selected. Novel influenza A/H1N1 virus was identified in at least one sample for 115 (43.6%) patients, the majority of them young adults. In 109 patients (94.8%) the virus was identified in the CNTS, and in 98 (85.2%) it was identified in the NPA (P ‫؍‬ 0.02). In 93 patients (80.1%), the virus was identified in both specimens. Spearman's rho correlation coefficient between the two methods was 0.82 (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in accuracy between the specimens when patients were stratified according to demographic or clinical characteristics except in the case of women, in whom the sensitivity of CNTS was higher (P ‫؍‬ 0.01). The combination of CNTS and NPA had a significantly higher sensitivity in identifying the virus than did each method alone (P ‫؍‬ 0.02 for the comparison of the combination of both sampling methods with CNTS, and P < 0.001 for the comparison with NPA). We conclude that in patients with the novel influenza A/H1N1 virus, the diagnostic yield of CNTS is higher than that of NPA. The combination of both sampling methods increases the likelihood of diagnosing the virus.

The infecting pathogens most commonly implicated in prosthetic joint infections are staphylococci, streptococci, and gram-negative rods. Prosthetic infections caused by Brucella spp. are rarely described in the literature. Treatment of prosthetic infections remains complex and controversial, the most accepted course being antibiotic treatment with removal or retention of prosthetic components. The case of a 60-year-old man who developed Brucella septic arthritis of the right knee in a total knee replacement is reported. Conservative treatment using a three-drug therapy was employed, with excellent results.

Limited information exists on the performance of antigen-based rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDT) in diagnosing the novel influenza A pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus. Large studies evaluating these tests in consecutive patients with a broad clinical spectrum of influenza-like illnesses are needed. We assessed the ClearView® Exact Influenza A & B test (Inverness Medical, Cologne, Germany) in comparison with real-time (r)RT-PCR for detection of the novel influenza A (H1N1) in a population-based prospective study of 1016 adults and children with suspected influenza in Spain. Three hundred and one (29.6%) patients had a positive sample with the rRT-PCR assay for influenza A and B viruses, with 297 (29.2%) confirmed cases of the novel influenza A pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus. Fifty (16.8%) patients with confirmed A (H1N1) 2009 virus were admitted to hospital, with six of them to the intensive care unit. In comparison with rRT-PCR, the ClearView® Exact Influenza A & B test had a sensitivity of 19% (95% CI 14-23), a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 75% (95% CI 72-78). The sensitivity of the test remained low across all demographic and clinical strata. Although a positive RIDT performed well in predicting PCR-confirmed infection with pandemic H1N1 virus, the sensitivity was very low and a negative test result was a poor predictor of the absence of infection.

Limited information exists on the performance of antigen-based rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDT) in diagnosing the novel influenza A pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus. Large studies evaluating these tests in consecutive patients with a broad clinical spectrum of influenzalike illnesses are needed. We assessed the ClearViewâ Exact Influenza A & B test (Inverness Medical, Cologne, Germany) in comparison with real-time (r)RT-PCR for detection of the novel influenza A (H1N1) in a population-based prospective study of 1016 adults and children with suspected influenza in Spain. Three hundred and one (29.6%) patients had a positive sample with the rRT-PCR assay for influenza A and B viruses, with 297 (29.2%) confirmed cases of the novel influenza A pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus. Fifty (16.8%) patients with confirmed A (H1N1) 2009 virus were admitted to hospital, with six of them to the intensive care unit. In comparison with rRT-PCR, the ClearViewâ Exact Influenza A & B test had a sensitivity of 19% (95% CI 14-23), a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 75% (95% CI 72-78). The sensitivity of the test remained low across all demographic and clinical strata. Although a positive RIDT performed well in predicting PCR-confirmed infection with pandemic H1N1 virus, the sensitivity was very low and a negative test result was a poor predictor of the absence of infection.