The World Health Organization has declared the SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) outbreak as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern and characterized it as a pandemic. 1,2 Since early March, 2020, the Spanish cases curve started to rise, with more than 177 000 people infected in 6 weeks. 3 The reported fatality-rate in the general population with COVID-19 admitted to a large tertiary Spanish Hospital is 20.7%, 34% in the subgroup of age 70-79 years. 4

Background and objectivesIn patients with kidney failure due to IgA nephropathy, IgA deposits can recur in a subsequent kidney transplant. The incidence, effect, and risk factors of IgA nephropathy recurrence is unclear, because most studies have been single center and sample sizes are relatively small.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsWe performed a multicenter, international, retrospective study to determine the incidence, risk factors, and treatment response of recurrent IgA nephropathy after kidney transplantation. Data were collected from all consecutive patients with biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy transplanted between 2005 and 2015, across 16 “The Post-Transplant Glomerular Disease” study centers in Europe, North America, and South America.ResultsOut of 504 transplant recipients with IgA nephropathy, recurrent IgA deposits were identified by kidney biopsy in 82 patients; cumulative incidence of recurrence was 23% at 15 years (95% confidence interval, 14 to 34). Multivariable Cox regression revealed a higher risk for recurrence of IgA deposits in patients with a pre-emptive kidney transplant (hazard ratio, 3.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.31 to 9.17) and in patients with preformed donor-specific antibodies (hazard ratio, 2.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 6.19). After kidney transplantation, development of de novo donor-specific antibodies was associated with subsequent higher risk of recurrence of IgA nephropathy (hazard ratio, 6.65; 95% confidence interval, 3.33 to 13.27). Immunosuppressive regimen was not associated with recurrent IgA nephropathy in multivariable analysis, including steroid use. Graft loss was higher in patients with recurrence of IgA nephropathy compared with patients without (hazard ratio, 3.69; 95% confidence interval, 2.04 to 6.66), resulting in 32% (95% confidence interval, 50 to 82) graft loss at 8 years after diagnosis of recurrence.ConclusionsIn our international cohort, cumulative risk of IgA nephropathy recurrence increased after transplant and was associated with a 3.7-fold greater risk of graft loss.

Background/Aims: Recurrent acute kidney injury (AKI) is common among patients after a first hospitalized AKI. However, little is known about the prognosis of recurrent AKI episodes in chronic kidney disease (CKD) development, cardiovascular events and mortality. Methods: A retrospective study included patients admitted to our Hospital from 2000 to 2010. AKI was defined according to the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative criteria. In the follow-up period after the first AKI episode, clinical, laboratory data and the number of repeated AKI episodes, etiology and severity were recorded. Results: Among the 359 AKI survivor patients included, 250 new AKI episodes were observed in 122 patients (34%). Variables independently associated to new episodes were: type 2 DM [OR 1.2, 95%CI 1.2-3.8, p=0.001], ischemic heart disease [OR 1.9; 95%CI 1.1-3.6, p=0.012], and SCr at the first AKI event>2,6 mg/dl [OR 1.2; 95%CI 1.03-1.42, p=0.02]. Development of CKD during four years follow-up was more frequent in patients with recurrent AKI, HR [2.2 (95% CI: 1.09-4.3, p=0.003)] and 44% of recurrent AKI patients who developed CKD occurred during the first 6 months after the initial event. Cardiovascular events were more frequent among patients with recurrent AKI patients than in those with one AKI episode (47.2% vs 24%, p=0.001). Mortality at 4 years was higher in the patient subgroup with several episodes of AKI as compared with those with a single episode [HR: 4.5 (95% CI 2.7-7.5) p<0.001]. Conclusion: Episodes of recurrent AKI have a high potential to be associated with relevant complications such as cardiovascular events, mortality and CKD development.

BackgroundCorrelation between antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and circulating HLA donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSA) is strong but imperfect in kidney transplant (KT) recipients, raising the possibility of undetected HLA-DSA or non-HLA antibodies contributing to ABMR. Detailed evaluation of the degree of HLA matching together with the identification of non-HLA antibodies in KT may help to decipher the antibody involved.MethodsWe retrospectively assessed patients with transplant biopsies scored following Banff’15 classification. Pre- and post-transplant serum samples were checked for HLA and non-HLA antibodies [MICA-Ab, angiotensin-II type-1-receptor (AT1R)-Ab, endothelin-1 type-A-receptor (ETAR)-Ab and crossmatches with primary aortic endothelial cells (EC-XM)]. We also analyzed HLA epitope mismatches (HLA-EM) between donors and recipients to explore their role in ABMR histology (ABMRh) with and without HLA-DSA.ResultsOne-hundred eighteen patients with normal histology (n = 19), ABMRh (n = 52) or IFTA (n = 47) were studied. ABMRh patients were HLA-DSApos (n = 38, 73%) or HLA-DSAneg (n = 14, 27%). Pre-transplant HLA-DSA and AT1R-Ab were more frequent in ABMRh compared with IFTA and normal histology cases (p = 0.006 and 0.003), without differences in other non-HLA antibodies. Only three ABMRhDSAneg cases showed non-HLA antibodies. ABMRhDSAneg and ABMRhDSApos cases showed similar biopsy changes and graft-survival. Both total class II and DRB1 HLA-EM were associated with ABMRhDSApos but not with ABMRhDSAneg. Multivariate analysis showed that pre-transplant HLA-DSA (OR: 3.69 [1.31–10.37], p = 0.013) and AT1R-Ab (OR: 5.47 [1.78–16.76], p = 0.003) were independent predictors of ABMRhDSApos.ConclusionsIn conclusion, pre-transplant AT1R-Ab is frequently found in ABMRhDSApos patients. However, AT1R-Ab, MICA-Ab, ETAR-Ab or EC-XM+ are rarely found among ABMRhDSAneg patients. Pre-transplant AT1R-Ab may act synergistically with preformed or de novo HLA-DSA to produce ABMRhDSApos but not ABMRhDSAneg. HLA epitope mismatch associates with ABMRhDSApos compared with ABMRhDSAneg, suggesting factors other than HLA are responsible for the damage.