No abstract

Locally advanced lung tumours often require complex surgical techniques to achieve an oncological and safe procedure. Sleeve resections when operating on endobronchial lesions or hilar tumours should be attempted whenever possible rather than performing a pneumonectomy. These procedures result in improved survival, better quality of life, a reduced loss of lung function and an improved operative mortality compared with pneumonectomy. Although the most common approach is an open thoracotomy, these complex surgical techniques can be performed in a thoracoscopic way with the skills and the experience gained from major video-assisted thoracoscopic procedures (VATS). However, despite the multiple advantages of VATS compared with thoracotomy, such as decreased postoperative pain and better recovery, this minimally invasive approach is still not widely adopted for advanced stages of lung cancer and complex resections. Concerns about performing an adequate oncological resection and safe reconstruction VATS are the main reasons for the low adoption of these minimally invasive approaches. Like other thoracoscopic techniques, VATS sleeve procedures also have a steep learning curve, and should therefore be performed either by or with skilled and experienced VATS surgeons to ensure safety and avoid complications. In this article, we describe the technique of thoracoscopic sleeve procedures through a single-incision (uniportal) approach for bronchial, bronchovascular, tracheal and carinal reconstruction, and review the literature reporting sleeve resections by VATS.

No abstract

Owing to advances in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), the majority of pulmonary resections can currently be performed by VATS in a safe manner with a low level of morbidity and mortality. The majority of the complications that occur during VATS can be minimized with correct preoperative planning of the case as well as careful pulmonary dissection. Coordination of the whole surgical team is essential when confronting an emergency such as major bleeding. This is particularly important during the VATS learning curve, where the occurrence of intraoperative complications, particularly significant bleeding, usually ends in a conversion to open surgery. However, conversion should not be considered as a failure of the VATS approach, but as a resource to maintain the patient's safety. The correct assessment of any bleeding is of paramount importance during major thoracoscopic procedures. Inadequate management of the source of bleeding may result in major vessel injury and massive bleeding. If bleeding occurs, a sponge stick should be readily available to apply pressure immediately to control the haemorrhage. It is always important to remain calm and not to panic. With the bleeding temporarily controlled, a decision must be made promptly as to whether a thoracotomy is needed or if the bleeding can be solved through the VATS approach. This will depend primarily on the surgeon's experience. The operative vision provided with high-definition cameras, specially designed or adapted instruments and the new sealants are factors that facilitate the surgeon's control. After experience has been acquired with conventional or uniportal VATS, the rate of complications diminishes and the majority of bleeding events are controlled without the need for conversion to thoracotomy.

Both contractile reserve by DSE and perfusion by MCE are predictive of functional recovery in hypokinetic segments after coronary revascularization in patients with chronic coronary revascularization in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. In akinetic segments, myocardial perfusion by MCE may exist in segments that do not recover contractile function after revascularization. Thus, contractile reserve during low-dose dobutamine infusion is a better predictor of functional recovery after revascularization in akinetic segments than perfusion.