Piriformospora indica is a root endophytic fungus with plant-promoting properties in numerous plant species and induces resistance against root and shoot pathogens in barley, wheat, and Arabidopsis. A study over several years showed that the endophyte P. indica colonised the roots of the most consumed vegetable crop tomato. P. indica improved the growth of tomato resulting in increased biomass of leaves by up to 20%. Limitation of disease severity caused by Verticillium dahliae by more than 30% was observed on tomato plants colonised by the endophyte. Further experiments were carried out in hydroponic cultures which are commonly used for the indoor production of tomatoes in central Europe. After adaptation of inoculation techniques (inoculum density, plant stage), it was shown that P. indica influences the concentration of Pepino mosaic virus in tomato shoots. The outcome of the interaction seems to be affected by light intensity. Most importantly, the endophyte increases tomato fruit biomass in hydroponic culture concerning fresh weight (up to 100%) and dry matter content (up to 20%). Hence, P. indica represents a suitable growth promoting endophyte for tomato which can be applied in production systems of this important vegetable plant not only in soil, but also in hydroponic cultures.

Cherry leaf roll virus (CLRV) belongs to the Nepovirus genus within the family Comoviridae. It has a host range which includes a number of wild tree and shrub species. The serological and molecular diversity of CLRV was assessed using a collection of isolates and samples recovered from woody and herbaceous host plants from different geographical origins. Molecular diversity was assessed by sequencing a short (375-bp) region of the 3 noncoding region (NCR) of the genomic RNAs while serological diversity was assessed using a panel of seven monoclonal antibodies raised initially against a walnut isolate of CLRV. The genomic region analyzed was shown to exhibit a significant degree of molecular variability with an average pairwise divergence of 8.5% (nucleotide identity). Similarly, serological variability proved to be high, with no single monoclonal antibody being able to recognize all isolates analyzed. Serological and molecular phylogenetic reconstructions showed a strong correlation. Remarkably, the diversity of CLRV populations is to a large extent defined by the host plant from which the viral samples are originally obtained. There are relatively few reports of plant viruses for which the genetic diversity is structured by the host plant. In the case of CLRV, we hypothesize that this situation may reflect the exclusive mode of transmission in natural plant populations by pollen and by seeds. These modes of transmission are likely to impose barriers to host change by the virus, leading to rapid biological and genetic separation of CLRV variants coevolving with different plant host species. Cherry leaf roll virus (CLRV) was first described in 1955 byPosnette and Cropley as causing a disease of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) in England (7). Since then it has been shown to exhibit a wide natural host range including a variety of herbaceous and woody plants. Some of the most common natural hosts of CLRV are common birch (Betula pendula Roth), black elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.), English walnut (Juglans regia L.), and sweet cherry. The virus is widely distributed and has been detected throughout Europe, the former U.S.S.R., North America, Chile (13), New Zealand, Australia, China (18), and Japan. CLRV is naturally transmitted through seeds and pollen (1, 18). It is a member of the genus Nepovirus (46) but, unlike the majority of other members of this genus, CLRV is not considered to be transmitted by soil-borne nematodes (45).CLRV has a bipartite single-stranded positive-sense RNA genome estimated to be about 15 kb total, with RNA-1 and RNA-2 sizes estimated at about 8.2 and 6.8 kb, respectively (29). Both RNAs are separately encapsidated in isometric particles (18). The genomic RNAs have a genome-encoded protein (VPg) covalently linked at their 5Ј terminus and are polyadenylated at their 3Ј terminus (4,12).CLRV belongs to the subgroup C nepoviruses. They are characterized by a large, separately encapsidated RNA-2 with a long (1.2 to 1.6 kb) 3Ј noncoding region which is identical or almost identical to that of RNA-...

王林发) 186 • Guoping Wang (王国平) 85 • Yanxiang Wang (王雁翔) 85 • Yaqin Wang (王亚琴) 38 • Muhammad Waqas 187 • Tàiyún Wèi (魏太云) 188 • Shaohua Wen (温少华) 85 • Anna E. Whitfield 189 • John V. Williams 190 • Yuri I. Wolf 99 • Jiangxiang Wu (吴建祥) 38 • Lei Xu (徐雷) 138 • Hironobu Yanagisawa (栁澤広 宣) 191 • Caixia Yang (杨彩霞) 69 • Zuokun Yang (杨作坤) 85 • F. Murilo Zerbini 192 • Lifeng Zhai (翟立峰) 193 • Yong-Zhen Zhang (张永振) 220,221 • Song Zhang (张松) 34 • Jinguo Zhang (张靖国) 194 • Zhe Zhang (张哲) 85 • Xueping Zhou (周雪平) 195

Analysis of the completely determined genomes of the plant-derived Acholeplasma brassicae strain O502 and A. palmae strain J233 revealed that the circular chromosomes are 1,877,792 and 1,554,229 bp in size, have a G + C content of 36 and 29%, and encode 1,690 and 1,439 proteins, respectively. Comparative analysis of these sequences and previously published genomes of A. laidlawii strain PG-8, ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris' strains, ‘Ca. P. australiense' and ‘Ca. P. mali' show a limited shared basic genetic repertoire. The acholeplasma genomes are characterized by a low number of rearrangements, duplication and integration events. Exceptions are the unusual duplication of rRNA operons in A. brassicae and an independently introduced second gene for a single-stranded binding protein in both genera. In contrast to phytoplasmas, the acholeplasma genomes differ by encoding the cell division protein FtsZ, a wide variety of ABC transporters, the F₀F₁ ATP synthase, the Rnf-complex, SecG of the Sec-dependent secretion system, a richly equipped repertoire for carbohydrate metabolism, fatty acid, isoprenoid and partial amino acid metabolism. Conserved metabolic proteins encoded in phytoplasma genomes such as the malate dehydrogenase SfcA, several transporters and proteins involved in host-interaction, and virulence-associated effectors were not predicted for the acholeplasmas.