This study was designed to evaluate the safety, reliability, and patient acceptance of outpatient continuous intravenous infusion (CVI) chemotherapy. Twenty-two patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer received induction chemotherapy with methotrexate, cisplatin and a 5-day CVI of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Patients were randomized to receive the 5-FU portion of cycle 1 either by a standard inpatient CVI chemotherapy delivery device (standard pump) or by the Infusor (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL), a portable chemotherapy delivery system that provides a constant flow of drug over a period of 24 hours. For cycle 2, patients crossed over to the alternative drug delivery method. Patients receiving chemotherapy via the Infusor could choose to be either inpatients or outpatients. Daily plasma concentrations of 5-FU were determined during the first two cycles of chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in the mean steady state plasma 5-FU levels achieved with either drug delivery method (329.7 +/- 95.8 ng/ml for infusor cycles vs. 352.8 +/- 114.9 ng/ml for standard pump cycles). Clinical toxicities consisted primarily of mucositis for both methods of drug delivery. Eight patients declined to receive CVI chemotherapy as outpatients citing as reasons fear of malfunction of the device, inconvenience of the frequent clinic visits necessitated by daily monitoring of plasma 5-FU concentrations, and restrictions in daily home activities. Eleven patients underwent CVI chemotherapy via Infusor as outpatients. All reported outpatient CVI chemotherapy as convenient and effective and, when eligible, chose it again in subsequent cycles. A comparison of estimated costs revealed reductions in daily costs of +366.00 (+2,200.00 per cycle) for outpatient chemotherapy. Outpatient CVI chemotherapy is a reliable drug delivery method that was accepted by a majority of patients in this study. These factors may help to establish outpatient CVI chemotherapy as a viable alternative to hospitalization.

We sought to use a previously derived pharmacodynamic model for 72-hour etoposide infusions to adaptively control administration of this agent and to demonstrate that more predictable toxicity could be obtained with this dosing scheme. A randomized crossover study design was used to compare "standard" dosing (125 mg/m2/day) to adaptive control, with dose adjustment at 28 hours based on the 24-hour plasma level. A total of 31 patients received 86 cycles of chemotherapy, 36 by standard dosing and 50 by adaptive control. However, there was no demonstrable advantage to the adaptive control scheme, because of apparent bias of the previous model. A new model was proposed that also included serum albumin, performance status, and prior RBC transfusions as measures of interpatient pharmacodynamic variability. We conclude that adaptive control dosing of etoposide is feasible but that the therapy must be individualized for both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability.

Both cisplatin and leucovorin may increase the activity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by increasing the intracellular concentration of reduced folates. Therefore, a Phase I study was conducted in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer in which high doses of oral leucovorin were added to the combination of cisplatin and 5-FU. Patients received intravenous cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of 5-FU at 600 mg/m2/day for 5 days. Leucovorin 50 mg/m2 orally was administered from the start of the cisplatin infusion and then every 6 hours throughout the 5-FU infusion. The dose of 5-FU was increased to 800 mg/m2/day and 1 g/m2/day according to observed toxicity. In a second phase of the study, the dose of leucovorin was increased to 50 mg/m2 orally every 4 hours. Twenty-five patients were registered: 23 had recurrent head and neck cancer after extensive treatment; two had newly diagnosed metastatic disease. The maximum tolerated dose of 5-FU was 800 mg/m2/day with leucovorin administered every 6 hours. Toxicities at that level included mild-to-moderate myelosuppression. Mucositis in the previously irradiated field prevented the further increase of the 5-FU dose to 1 g/m2/day. Identical toxicities were observed when administering 5-FU at 800 mg/m2/day with 50 mg/m2 of leucovorin every 4 hours. Eighteen patients were evaluated for response: one had a pathologic complete response; nine had a partial response (including four who had previously received cisplatin and 5-FU as induction chemotherapy). Eight patients did not respond. The median survival for all 25 patients was 6.5 months. It was concluded that the combination of cisplatin, 5-FU, and leucovorin is active in the treatment of recurrent head and neck cancer. The maximum tolerated dose of 5-FU in previously treated patients is 800 mg/m2/day, with mucositis being the dose-limiting toxicity. Further investigation of this regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer is in progress.