Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a non-invasive “liquid biopsy” for early breast cancer diagnosis. We evaluated the suitability of ctDNA analysis in the diagnosis of early breast cancer after mammography findings, comparing PIK3CA and TP53 mutations between tumor biopsies and pre-biopsy circulating DNA. Matched plasma and frozen fresh tissue biopsies from patients with Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) 4c/5 mammography findings and subsequent diagnosis of primary breast cancer were analyzed using NGS TruSeq Custom Amplicon Low Input Panel (Illumina) and plasma SafeSEQ (Sysmex Inostics). The same plasma and tumor mutations were observed in eight of 29 patients (27.6%) with four in TP53 and five in PIK3CA mutations. Sequencing analysis also revealed four additional ctDNA mutations (three in TP53 and one in PIK3CA) previously not identified in three patients tissue biopsy. One of these patients had mutations in both genes. Age, tumor grade and size, immunohistochemical (IHC) subtype, BIRADS category, and lymph node positivity were significantly associated with the detectability of these blood tumor-derived mutations. In conclusion, ctDNA analysis could be used in early breast cancer diagnosis, providing critical clinical information to improve patient diagnosis.

9008 Background: Amivantamab, a fully human bispecific antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and MET, is approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertion after prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Given its bispecific nature, amivantamab is being explored in patients (pts) with primary MET exon 14 skipping mutation (METex14) in the MET-2 cohort of the CHRYSALIS study. Methods: CHRYSALIS (NCT02609776) is an ongoing phase 1 dose escalation/dose expansion study of amivantamab in pts with advanced NSCLC. Pts with primary METex14 whose disease progressed on or who declined current standard of care therapy were treated with amivantamab 1050 mg (pts <80 kg) or 1400 mg (pts ≥80 kg) weekly in cycle 1 and biweekly thereafter. Response was assessed by investigators using RECIST v1.1. Results: As of 2 Dec 2021, 43 pts with METex14 had received amivantamab. Median age was 70 y (range, 43-88), 58% were women, median prior lines of therapy was 2 (range, 0-10) [eg, crizotinib (n=13), capmatinib (n=11), tepotinib (n=5), anti-MET antibody (n=1)], and 23% had history of brain metastases at baseline. In 36 pts with ≥1 postbaseline disease assessment, median duration of follow-up was 5.8 months (range, 0.3-15.8); 6 pts had no prior treatment, 11 had no prior MET inhibitor, and 19 had a prior MET inhibitor. Overall response rate was 33% (50% [3/6] in treatment-naïve pts, 46% [5/11] in pts with no prior MET inhibitor, and 21% [4/19] in pts with prior MET inhibitor therapy). Clinical benefit rate was >54% regardless of prior treatment (Table). Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached (range, 2.1-12.2 months); 67% (8/13) had DOR ≥6 months. Ten of the 12 responders remain on treatment (6.0-14.4 months) with ongoing responses; 2 discontinued after 2 and 12 months, respectively. Safety profile was consistent with previously reported experience of amivantamab (Sabari 2021 JTO 16(3):S108-109). Treatment-related adverse events leading to dose reduction or discontinuation occurred in 3 pts, each. Conclusions: Amivantamab demonstrates anti-tumor activity in primary METex14 NSCLC including after prior MET inhibitor treatment. Enrollment is ongoing and updated data will be shown. Clinical trial information: NCT02609776. [Table: see text]

267 Background: Abiraterone, enzalutamide and docetaxel represent first-line (1L) treatment options in mCRPC. A significant correlation between rPFS and OS has been reported for patients treated with 1L abi and enza in mCRPC. It is however unclear whether TTPP or rPFS present a similar magnitude of correlation with OS in Doc-treated pts. Methods: We evaluated the association of TTPP and rPFS with OS in pts treated with 1L Abi/Enza or Doc in a prospective multicenter observational cohort study. TTPP and rPFS were defined as per PCWG2. Correlation between TTPP and rPFS with OS was evaluated with Spearman rho coefficients (r), and by calculating the concordance index (c-index) in Cox-regression models. Results: 406 out of 419 pts received 1L Abi/Enza or Doc. After a median follow-up of 40 months (m), 253 mCRPC-related deaths were observed, with a median OS of 31.3 m (95% CI: 27.6-35). Median rPFS and TTPP were 10.8 m (95% CI:9.7-11.9) and 7.2 m (95% CI:6.7-7.7), respectively. Significant correlations between rPFS/TTPP and OS were observed in all pts treated at 1L, as well as in Abi/Enza and Doc treated pts (Table). R and c-index were consistently higher in Abi/Enza treated pts than in Doc treated pts, with a higher difference in predictive accuracy of the Cox regression model observed when comparing the association between TTPP and OS (c-index 0.788 in Abi/Enza treated pts vs 0.627 in Doc treated pts). Conclusions: Differences in r and c-index were observed when evaluating the association between TTPP/rPFS and OS in Abi/Enza and Doc treated pts, suggesting rPFS and TTPP may better predict OS in Abi/Enza than in Doc-treated pts. Indirect comparisons of TTPP in Abi/Enza vs Doc pts may therefore not reflect their true impact on OS. Further insight on the exact significance of TTPP is needed. Clinical trial information: NCT03075735. [Table: see text]

No abstract