To compare the functional outcomes of on-vs off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) within a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Materials and MethodsThe CLOCK study (CLamp vs Off Clamp the Kidney during robotic partial nephrectomy; NCT 02287987) is a multicentre RCT including patients with normal baseline function, two kidneys and masses with RENAL scores ≤ 10. Pre-and postoperative renal scintigraphy was prescribed. Renal defatting and hilum isolation were required in both study arms; in the on-clamp arm, ischaemia was imposed until the completion of medullary renorraphy, while in the off-clamp condition it was not allowed throughout the procedure. The primary endpoint was 6-month absolute variation in estimated glomerular filtration rate (AV-GFR); secondary endpoints were: 12, 18 and 24-month AV-GFR; 6-month estimated glomerular filtration rate variation >25% rate (RV-GFR >25); and absolute variation in ipsilateral split renal function (AV-SRF). The planned sample size was 102 + 102 cases, after taking account crossover of cases to the alternate study arm; a 1:1 randomization was performed. AV-GFR and AV-SRF were compared using analysis of covariation, and RV-GFR >25 was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol analyses (PP) were performed. ResultsA total of 160 and 164 patients were randomly assigned to on-and off-clamp RAPN, respectively; crossover was observed in 14% and 43% of the on-and off-clamp arms, respectively. We were unable to find any statistically significant difference between on-vs off-clamp with regard to the primary endpoint (ITT: 6-month AV-GFR −6.2 vs −5.1 mL/min, mean difference 0.2 mL/min, 95% confidence interval [CI] −3.1 to 3.4 [P = 0.8]; PP: 6-month AV-GFR −6.8 vs −4.2 mL/min, mean difference 1.6 mL/min, 95% CI −2.3 to 5.5 [P = 0.7]) or with regard to the secondary endpoints. The median warm ischaemia time was 14 vs 15 min in the ITT analysis and 14 vs 0 min in the PP analysis. ConclusionIn patients with regular baseline function and two kidneys, we found no evidence of differences in functional outcomes for on-vs off-clamp RAPN.

The dose of dopamine producing an optimal improvement of systemic and renal hemodynamics in congestive heart failure is higher than usually reported. A greater clinical severity of congestive heart failure impairs the renal effects of dopamine, probably through a selective loss in renal vasodilating capacity.

This study aims to evaluate (1) the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) as a steroid-sparing agent in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) and (2) the usefulness of F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the follow-up and to detect disease activity. We retrospectively evaluated 12 patients with GCA treated with TCZ (8 mg/kg/mo). Pre- and posttherapy data about clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory results, FDG-PET imaging study, and the mean glucocorticoid (GC) dose were used to assess disease activity. Tocilizumab achieved complete disease remission in all patients. Mean FDG-PET-detected standard uptake value decreased from 2.05 ± 0.64 to 1.78 ± 0.45 ( P = .005). In 2 patients in whom temporal arteries color Doppler sonography examination was consistent with temporal arteritis, the hypoechoic halo disappeared after TCZ treatment. Mean GC dose was tapered from 26.6 ± 13.4 mg/d to 3.3 ± 3.1 mg/d ( P< .0001). One-half of the patients discontinued GC therapy. Three patients experienced severe adverse reactions and had to stop TCZ therapy. In accordance with previous reports, TCZ is an effective steroid-sparing agent for GCA, although careful monitoring of adverse drug reactions is needed. F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography could be used to monitor disease activity in TCZ-treated patients, but prospective studies are needed to confirm these data.