Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is the most common genotypic method used in reference and clinical laboratories for typing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Many different protocols have been developed in laboratories that have extensive experience with the technique and have established national databases. However, the comparabilities of the different European PFGE protocols for MRSA and of the various national MRSA clones themselves had not been addressed until now. This multinational European Union (EU) project has established for the first time a European database of representative epidemic MRSA (EMRSA) strains and has compared them by using a new "harmonized" PFGE protocol developed by a consensus approach that has demonstrated sufficient reproducibility to allow the successful comparison of pulsed-field gels between laboratories and the tracking of strains around the EU. In-house protocols from 10 laboratories in eight European countries were compared by each center with a "gold standard" or initial harmonized protocol in which many of the parameters had been standardized. The group found that it was not important to standardize some elements of the protocol, such as the type of agarose, DNA block preparation, and plug digestion. Other elements were shown to be critical, namely, a standard gel volume and concentration of agarose, the DNA concentration in the plug, the ionic strength and volume of running buffer used, the running temperature, the voltage, and the switching times of electrophoresis. A new harmonized protocol was agreed on, further modified in a pilot study in two laboratories, and finally tested by all others. Seven laboratories' gels were found to be of sufficiently good quality to allow comparison of the strains by using a computer software program, while two gels could not be analyzed because of inadequate destaining and DNA overloading. Good-quality gels and inclusion of an internal quality control strain are essential before attempting intercenter PFGE comparisons. A number of clonally related strains have been shown to be present in multiple countries throughout Europe. The well-known Iberian clone has been demonstrated in Belgium,
To estimate the proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from humans that were sequence type (ST) 398, we surveyed 24 laboratories in 17 countries in Europe in 2007. Livestock-associated MRSA ST398 accounted for only a small proportion of MRSA isolates from humans; most were from the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, and Austria.
We analyzed a representative sample of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from 11 European countries (referred to as the HARMONY collection) using three molecular typing methods used within the HARMONY group to examine their usefulness for large, multicenter MRSA surveillance networks that use these different laboratory methodologies. MRSA isolates were collected based on their prevalence in each center and their genetic diversity, assessed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). PFGE groupings (<3 bands difference between patterns) were compared to those made by sequencing of the variable repeats in the protein A gene spa and clonal designations based on multilocus sequence typing (MLST), combined with PCR analysis of the staphylococcal chromosome cassette containing the mec genes involved in methicillin resistance (SCCmec). A high level of discrimination was achieved using each of the three methodologies, with discriminatory indices between 89.5% and 91.9% with overlapping 95% confidence intervals. There was also a high level of concordance of groupings made using each method. MLST/SCCmec typing distinguished 10 groups containing at least two isolates, and these correspond to the majority of nosocomial MRSA clones described in the literature. PFGE and spa typing resolved 34 and 31 subtypes, respectively, within these 10 MRSA clones, with each subtype differing only slightly from the most common pattern using each method. The HARMONY group has found that the methods used in this study differ in their availability and affordability to European centers involved in MRSA surveillance. Here, we demonstrate that the integration of such technologies is achievable, although common protocols (such as we have developed for PFGE) may also be important, as is the use of centralized Internet sites to facilitate data analysis. PFGE and spa-typing data from analysis of MRSA isolates from the many centers that have access to the relevant equipment can be compared to reference patterns/sequences, and clonal designations can be made. In the majority of cases, these will correspond to those made by the (more expensive) method of choice-MLST/SCCmec typing-and these alternative methods can therefore be used as frontline typing systems for multicenter surveillance of MRSA.Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is among the most common nosocomial pathogens globally and is generally acknowledged as the most significant due to the burden of disease it causes and to the evolution and global spread of multidrug-resistant clones. MRSA isolation rates in the United States, parts of Europe, and Asia have been increasing for more than 4 decades (36), and recent figures show that in some areas Ͼ50% of S. aureus bacteremias are caused by MRSA (4, 5, 6). Emerging intermediate, and more recently high-level (vanA-encoded), vancomycin resistance (8,22) and increasing numbers of multidrug-resistant MRSA emphasize the importance of effective antimicrobial prescribing and infection control measures that can be informed...
Based on their strain characteristics, the MRSA isolates from pets investigated in this study closely resembled ST22 MRSA isolates which are widely disseminated in German hospitals. The results of this study indicate that cross-transmission of MRSA between pet animals and humans might have occurred.
OBJECTIVE: to present data on prevalence and interregional spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Germany. METHODS: A nationwide collection of MRSA isolates from nosocomial infections in 143 hospitals was established from isolates (n=4368) sent to a microbiological reference center during 1993--95. As chosen by distinguishable resistance phenotypes at each time of occurrence during the study period, 1830 isolates were subjected to molecular typing by means of Smal macrorestriction patterns, PCR for RNA gene spacer patterns, and PCR for patterns of DNA stretches flanked by the ERIC-2 sequence and flanked by Tn916 and ribosomal binding site. In addition, data from a multicenter study on the incidence of antibiotic resistance have been analyzed (32 centers, 637 S. aureus isolates). RESULTS: In 1995 the prevalence of MRSA among S. aureus isolates was 8.7% overall in central Europe (including Germany), in comparison to 1.7% in 1990. From 1993 until now, a continuous interregional dissemination of six epidemic strains, which were identified by molecular typing, was recorded. Besides these epidemic strains, 15 MRSA strains were identified which could not be allocated to the epidemic MRSA or to the known clonal groups of the species S. aureus. MRSA from three cases of sporadic nosocomial infections exhibited characteristics of the clonal group of S. aureus with the capacity for toxic shock syndrome formation. The pattern of one MRSA corresponded to those of the S. aureus group exhibiting phage pattern 94,96. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of MRSA has increased in central Europe (and Germany) during the last 5 years, to 8.7%. The main source of infection with MRSA is obviously interregional dissemination of epidemic strains. At the same time, the mecA gene has been acquired by strains previously sensitive to methicillin.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.