No abstract

Aim: The present study was done to evaluate and compare the stability of the implant and the loss of crestal bone in the implants placed using OD drilling and traditional drilling technique. Setting and Design: In vivo -comparative study. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 implants were placed in the anterior maxilla, and the patients were divided into two groups. In Group I, the implants were placed using traditional drilling technique, and in Group II, implant placement was done using OD drilling technique. Primary stability was measured in both the groups at baseline (immediate postoperative), and at an interval of 6 months, while crestal bone levels were measured at baseline, 6, and 8 months. Statistical Analysis Used: The data obtained were subjected to unpaired t-test to make intergroup comparisons, while one-way ANOVA F -test was used to make intragroup comparisons. Results: The primary stability of implant placed using OD drills was found to be slightly higher than implant placed with traditional drilling; however, there was no statistical significance ( P > 0.05). When the data obtained for crestal bone levels were statistically analyzed, no significant difference between the two groups was obtained ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study following conclusions were drawn: there was no statistically significant difference in implant stability between the traditional drilling and OD drilling ( P < 0.05). On comparison of crestal bone levels between OD and traditional drilling, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups ( P < 0.05).

Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non-surgical treatment of chronic and aggressive periodontitis (Protocol)