Objective: The aim of this study was to identify procedure-specific risk factors independently associated with incisional hernia (IH) and demonstrate the feasibility of preoperative risk stratification through the use of an IH risk calculator app and decision–support interface. Summary Background Data: IH occurs after 10% to 15% of all abdominal surgeries (AS) and remains among the most challenging, seemingly unavoidable complications. However, there is a paucity of readily available, actionable tools capable of predicting IH occurrence at the point-of-care. Methods: Patients (n = 29,739) undergoing AS from 2005 to 2016 were retrospectively identified within inpatient and ambulatory databases at our institution. Surgically treated IH, complications, and costs were assessed. Predictive models were generated using regression analysis and corroborated using a validation group. Results: The incidence of operative IH was 3.8% (N = 1127) at an average follow-up of 57.9 months. All variables were weighted according to β-coefficients generating 8 surgery-specific predictive models for IH occurrence, all of which demonstrated excellent risk discrimination (C-statistic = 0.76–0.89). IH occurred most frequently after colorectal (7.7%) and vascular (5.2%) surgery. The most common occurring risk factors that increased the likelihood of developing IH were history of AS (87.5%) and smoking history (75%). An integrated, surgeon-facing, point-of-care risk prediction instrument was created in an app for preoperative estimation of hernia after AS. Conclusions: Operative IH occurred in 3.8% of patients after nearly 5 years of follow-up in a predictable manner. Using a bioinformatics approach, risk models were transformed into 8 unique surgery-specific models. A risk calculator app was developed which stakeholders can access to identify high-risk IH patients at the point-of-care.

The insertion funnel group experienced a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of reoperations performed due to capsular contracture within 12 months of primary breast augmentation.

The landscape of gender dysphoria has changed dramatically in recent years secondary to increased societal acceptance, legislative changes, and medical providers' increased awareness of the associated psychosocial burden associated with the diagnosis. National and global advocacy efforts, in conjunction with expanded third-party insurance coverage, have resulted in new health care opportunities for patients suffering from gender dysphoria. Delivering quality, streamlined health care to these patients requires a complex multidisciplinary approach, involving multiple medical and mental health disciplines, including plastic surgeons. To accommodate the expanding demand for gender-affirmation surgery, academic medical centers specializing in these procedures are gradually emerging. Advancing surgical techniques in the setting of rising patient demand encourage plastic surgeons to increasingly provide high-quality health care to this diverse patient population in an effort to optimize psychosocial functioning and minimize the burden of gender dysphoria. Although the current literature is replete with the evolving surgical and technical approaches to gender-affirming surgery, there remain critical gaps in the plastic surgery literature describing the delivery of comprehensive care to these patients. To address these gaps, the authors establish a framework that plastic surgeons can use to guide their management of patients with gender dysphoria to optimize surgical and psychosocial outcomes. First, the authors describe a timeline of events that have shaped present-day transgender medicine and characterize the current role of the plastic surgeon in the management of gender dysphoria. Subsequently, the authors discuss psychosocial and ethical considerations surrounding gender dysphoria. Finally, the authors discuss the future scope of transgender medicine.