The first consensus report of the working party of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) set up in 2004 on acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) was published in 2009. With international groups volunteering to join, the “APASL ACLF Research Consortium (AARC)” was formed in 2012, which continued to collect prospective ACLF patient data. Based on the prospective data analysis of nearly 1400 patients, the AARC consensus was published in 2014. In the past nearly four-and-a-half years, the AARC database has been enriched to about 5200 cases by major hepatology centers across Asia. The data published during the interim period were carefully analyzed and areas of contention and new developments in the field of ACLF were prioritized in a systematic manner. The AARC database was also approached for answering some of the issues where published data were limited, such as liver failure grading, its impact on the ‘Golden Therapeutic Window’, extrahepatic organ dysfunction and failure, development of sepsis, distinctive features of acute decompensation from ACLF and pediatric ACLF and the issues were analyzed. These initiatives concluded in a two-day meeting in October 2018 at New Delhi with finalization of the new AARC consensus. Only those statements, which were based on evidence using the Grade System and were unanimously recommended, were accepted. Finalized statements were again circulated to all the experts and subsequently presented at the AARC investigators meeting at the AASLD in November 2018. The suggestions from the experts were used to revise and finalize the consensus. After detailed deliberations and data analysis, the original definition of ACLF was found to withstand the test of time and be able to identify a homogenous group of patients presenting with liver failure. New management options including the algorithms for the management of coagulation disorders, renal replacement therapy, sepsis, variceal bleed, antivirals and criteria for liver transplantation for ACLF patients were proposed. The final consensus statements along with the relevant background information and areas requiring future studies are presented here.

Background Patients with acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (ACLF) have coagulation failure in the setting of systemic inflammatory syndrome (SIRS), sepsis and extra‐hepatic organ failures. Methods Consecutive ACLF patients without sepsis at baseline were assessed at days 0, 3 and 7 with thromboelastography (TEG) and specific assays (Factor VIII, von Willebrand factor [vWF], protein C and antithrombin III [ATIII]) and followed for development of sepsis, bleeding and outcome. Results Of 243 patients, 114 (63% ethanol related; mean age 44.3 ± 11.7 years; 90% male) were recruited. SIRS was noted in 39 (34.2%), 45 (39.5%) and 46 (40%) patients at days 0, 3 and 7 and sepsis in 28 (24%) and 52 (56.1%) patients at days 3 and 7 respectively. The 28‐ and 90‐day survivals were 62% and 51% respectively. A hypocoagulable TEG at baseline was a predictor of bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 2.1; CI 1.6‐4.9; P = 0.050) and mortality (HR 1.9; CI 1.3‐7.9; P = 0.043). ACLF patients had increased Factor VIII, vWF, tissue factor levels and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) activity with reduced protein C and ATIII. Coagulation parameters like Coagulation Index (HR 2.1; CI 1.1‐4.5; P = 0.044),clot lysis (HR 3.2; CI 1.9‐3.4; P = 0.033), low protein C < 30% (HR 2.1; CI 1.5‐2.8; P = 0.017), ATIII (HR 1.4; CI 1.7‐3.1; P = 0.052) and tPA (HR 1.5; CI 1.1‐2.4; P = 0.052) were predictors of mortality at day 28. Protein C activity <30% (HR 1.3; CI 1.0‐2.9; P = 0.042) and tPA >20 ng/mL (HR 1.2; CI 1.1‐2.1; P = 0.040) predicted mortality when adjusted for age, gender and baseline MELD. Conclusions Dynamic coagulation derangements, measured by TEG, determine the likelihood of bleeding and mortality in ACLF.

Acute insults from viruses, infections, or alcohol are established causes of decompensation leading to acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Information regarding drugs as triggers of ACLF is lacking. We examined data regarding drugs producing ACLF and analyzed clinical features, laboratory characteristics, outcome, and predictors of mortality in patients with drug-induced ACLF. METHODS: We identified drugs as precipitants of ACLF among prospective cohort of patients with ACLF from the Asian Pacific Association of Study of Liver (APASL) ACLF Research Consortium (AARC) database. Drugs were considered precipitants after exclusion of known causes together with a temporal association between exposure and decompensation. Outcome was defined as death from decompensation. RESULTS: Of the 3,132 patients with ACLF, drugs were implicated as a cause in 329 (10.5%, mean age 47 years, 65% men) and other nondrug causes in 2,803 (89.5%) (group B). Complementary and alternative medications (71.7%) were the commonest insult, followed by combination antituberculosis therapy drugs (27.3%). Alcoholic liver disease (28.6%), cryptogenic liver disease (25.5%), and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (16.7%) were common causes of underlying liver diseases. Patients with druginduced ACLF had jaundice (100%), ascites (88%), encephalopathy (46.5%), high Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) (30.2), and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score (12.1). The overall 90-day mortality was higher in drug-induced (46.5%) than in non-drug-induced ACLF (38.8%) (P 5 0.007). The Cox regression model identified arterial lactate (P < 0.001) and total bilirubin (P 5 0.008) as predictors of mortality.

The article Acute-on-chronic liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific association for the study of the liver (APASL): an update, written by [Shiv Sarin], was originally published electronically on the publisher’s internet portal (currently SpringerLink) on June 06, 2019 without open access.

Background and Aim: Plasma-exchange (PE) has improved survival in acute liver failure by ameliorating systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). We evaluated PE and compared it to Fractional Plasma Separation and Adsorption (FPSA) and standard medical treatment (SMT) in a large multinational cohort of ACLF patients. Methods: Data were prospectively collected from the AARC database and analysed.Matching by propensity risk score (PRS) was performed. Competing risk survival analysis was done to identify deaths because of multiorgan failure (MOF). In a subset of 10 patients, we also evaluated the mechanistic basis of response to PE. Results: ACLF patients (n = 1866, mean age 44.3 ± 12.3 yrs, 93% males, 65% alcoholics) received either artificial liver support (ALS) (n = 162); [PE (n = 131), FPSA (n = 31)] or were continued on standard medical therapy (SMT) (n = 1704). In the PRSmatched cohort (n = 208, [ALS-119; PE-94, FPSA-25)], SMT-89). ALS therapies were associated with a significantly higher resolution of SIRS (Odd's ratio 9.23,3.42-24.8), lower and delayed development of MOF (Hazard ratio 7.1, 4.5-11.1), and lower liverfailure-related deaths as compared to FPSA and SMT (P < .05). PE cleared inflammatory cytokines, damage-associated molecular patterns, and endotoxin in all patients. Responders improved monocyte phagocytic function and mitochondrial respiration and increased the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) compared to non-responders. PE was associated with lesser adverse effects as compared to FPSA. Conclusions: PE improves systemic inflammation and lowers the development of MOF in patients with ACLF. Plasma-exchange provides significant survival benefit over FPSA and could be a preferred modality of liver support for ACLF patients.