Postoperative residual AR >1/4 is an independent predictor of postoperative mortality and should be considered in the selection of surgical approach and management strategy for patients in need of standard and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
OBJECTIVES
Patients with mechanical circulatory support bridged to a heart transplant (HTx) are at higher risk of postoperative graft dysfunction. In this subset, a mode of graft preservation that shortens graft ischaemia should be beneficial.
METHODS
The outcomes of 38 patients on mechanical circulatory support (extracorporeal life support, left ventricular assist device and biventricular assist device) who received a HTx between 2015 and 2020 were analysed according to the method of graft preservation: cold storage (CS) group, 24 (63%) or ex vivo perfusion (EVP) group, 14 (37%).
RESULTS
The median age was 57 (range 30–73) vs 64 (35–75) years (P = 0.10); 88% were men (P = 0.28); extracorporeal life support was more frequent in the CS group (54% vs 36%; P = 0.27) versus left ventricular and biventricular assist devices in the EVP group (46% vs 64%; P = 0.27). Clamping time was shorter in the EVP group (P < 0.001) and ischaemic time >4 h was higher in the CS group (P = 0.01). Thirty-day mortality was 13% (0–27%) in the CS group and 0% (P = 0.28) in the EVP group. A significantly lower primary graft failure [7% (0–23%) vs 42% (20–63%); P = 0.03] was observed in the EVP group. Survival at 1 year was 79 ± 8% (63–95%) in the CS group and 84 ± 10% (64–104%) in the EVP group (P = 0.95).
CONCLUSIONS
Our results support the use of ex vivo graft perfusion in patients on mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to a HTx. This technique, by shortening graft ischaemic time, seems to improve post-HTx outcomes.
The Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless prosthesis, with the modified technique herein described, seems to be a good option in most of cases of destructive aortic valve endocarditis. It is promptly available in different sizes, easy to implant and, due to its pericardial inflow skirt, ideal for extensive reconstruction of the LVOT with good haemodynamic performance and low risk of relapse.
Background
Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) has been emerging as a strong predictor of mortality among patients with cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to verify if RDW is able to predict survival after heart transplantation (HTx).
Methods
Two hundred and eighteen recipients who underwent HTx between 2000 and 2013 were classified into three groups according to the pre-HTx RDW tertile values (14.6 and 16.4%), and their outcomes were compared. Mean follow-up was 6.6 ± 4.2 years.
Results
RDW correlated with other markers of chronic pathological conditions, such as the Index for Mortality Prediction after Cardiac Transplantation (IMPACT) score (P = 0.002) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (P < 0.001), and with creatinine levels (P = 0.007), previous cardiac surgery (P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.02), haemoglobin value (P = 0.004), pulmonary capillary wedge and central venous pressures (P = 0.019 and 0.01, respectively), systolic and mean pulmonary artery pressures (P = 0.002 and 0.014, respectively). The rate of 30-day mortality from the lowest to the highest RDW tertile was 1.4, 4 and 9% (P = 0.02), respectively.
Long-term mortality correlated at multivariate analysis with recipient age [hazard ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.02–1.09], donor age (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% CI 1.0–1.04) and RDW (hazard ratio 1.13, 95% CI 1.04–1.23). The survival probability at 4, 8 and 12 years was 90, 84 and 74% for recipients with RDW less than 14.6%, while it was 72, 60 and 42% for recipients with RDW more than 16.4% (hazard ratio 3.29, 95% CI 1.74–6.24). No differences were found between causes of death.
Conclusion
RDW correlated with survival in HTx recipients. This marker of blood cell size may represent a surrogate of disease and a helpful tool in the risk-assessment process.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.