Our study suggests that PC2 expression and Akt phosphorylation are related at the molecular level, resulting in a change in cell cycle and an increase in pituitary adenoma size. An elevation of plasma alphaMSH could conjecture the activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3/Akt cascade in PC2-positive APPAs and may become a valuable clinical marker of tumor growth in Cushing's disease.

No abstract

Proopiomelanocortin processing in corticotroph cells is known to be operated by prohormone convertase (PC) 1/3 which is activating several pro-proteins and prohormones by intracellular limited proteolysis processing. In this study, we hypothesized that PC1/3 expression differs between Cushing's disease (CD) and silent corticotroph adenoma (SCA), and investigated whether PC1/3 expression is involved in the adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) silence of SCA. We performed immunohistochemical analysis of pituitary adenoma specimens for six adenohypophysial hormones, PC1/3 and chromogranin A (CgA). Subjects for this study consisted of 12 anterior pituitary adenomas of CD (1 male, 11 female; 14-70 years old) and 31 non-functioning adenomas (23 male, 8 female; 32-71 years old).ACTH immunoreactivity was observed in all of CD and three of 31 non-functioning adenomas. The three cases diagnosed as SCA were also positive for growth hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone. Cushing's adenomas and SCAs were all positive for PC1/3. PC1/3-positive cells did not always colocalize with ACTH but some of them colocalized with CgA in SCAs. Even if PC1/3 is not present in corticotroph cells, PC1/3 immunoreactivity in SCA may originate from CgA-positive cells. We conclude that immunohistochemistry for PC1/3 is not helpful for differential diagnosis between CD and SCA in clinical practice, though the regulation of PC1/3 expression is likely to be an important etiological factor in ACTH silence of SCA. The diversity of immunohistochemical properties of SCA leads us to speculate that it is not a single entity and may be a general diagnostic term for adenomas of varying etiology.

The present study investigated the role of K(+) channels in the inhibitory effect of glucocorticoid on adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) release induced by corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) using cultured rat anterior pituitary cells. Apamin and charybdotoxin (CTX) did not have a significant effect on ACTH release induced by CRH (1 nM). Tetraethylammonium (TEA), a broad spectrum K(+) channel blocker, increased the ACTH response to CRH only at the highest concentration (10 mM). The exposure to 100 nM corticosterone for 60 min inhibited the CRH-induced ACTH release. Neither TEA, apamin, nor CTX affected the inhibitory effect of corticosterone. In contrast, astemizole (Ast) and E-4031, ether-a-go-go-related gene (erg) K(+) channel blockers, abolished the inhibitory effect of corticosterone on CRH-induced ACTH release (1.25+/-0.10 vs. 1.45+/-0.11 ng/well at 10 microM Ast, p>0.05, 1.71+/-0.16 vs. 1.91+/-0.32 ng/well at 10 microM E-4031, p>0.05, vehicle vs. corticosterone). RT-PCR demonstrated all three subtypes of rat-erg mRNAs in the pituitary and corticosterone increased only erg1 mRNA up to 2.47+/-0.54 fold. In conclusion, erg K(+) channels were up-regulated by glucocorticoid, and have indispensable roles in delayed glucocorticoid inhibition of CRH-induced ACTH release by rat pituitary cells.

Neuropeptide W (NPW) was isolated as an endogenous ligand for NPBWR1, an orphan G protein-coupled receptor localized in the rat brain, including the paraventricular nucleus. It has been reported that central administration of NPW stimulates corticosterone secretion in rats. We hypothesized that NPW activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis via corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) and/or arginine vasopressin (AVP). NPW at 1 pM to 10 nM did not affect basal or ACTH-induced corticosterone release from dispersed rat adrenocortical cells, or basal and CRF-induced ACTH release from dispersed rat anterior pituitary cells. In conscious and unrestrained male rats, intravenous administration of 2.5 and 25 nmol NPW did not affect plasma ACTH levels. However, intracerebroventricular (icv) administration of 2.5 and 5.0 nmol NPW increased plasma ACTH levels in a dose-dependent manner at 15 min after stimulation (5.0 vs. 2.5 nmol NPW vs. vehicle: 1802 ± 349 vs. 1170 ± 204 vs. 151 ± 28 pg/mL, respectively, mean ± SEM). Pretreatment with astressin, a CRF receptor antagonist, inhibited the increase in plasma ACTH levels induced by icv administration of 2.5 nmol NPW at 15 min (453 ± 176 vs. 1532 ± 343 pg/mL, p<0.05) and at 30 min (564 ± 147 vs. 1214 ± 139 pg/mL, p<0.05) versus pretreatment with vehicle alone. However, pretreatment with [1-(β-mercapto-β, β-cyclopentamethylenepropionic acid), 2-(Ο-methyl)tyrosine]-arg-vasopressin, a V1a/V1b receptor antagonist, did not affect icv NPW-induced ACTH release at any time (p>0.05). In conclusion, we suggest that central NPW activates the HPA axis by activating hypothalamic CRF but not AVP.