AimsEpithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) is a cell surface protein with oncogenic features that is expressed on healthy human epithelia and corresponding malignant tumours. EpCAM expression frequently correlates with more aggressive tumour behaviour and new EpCAM-specific therapeutic agents have recently been approved for clinical use in patients with cancer. However, no consensus exists on how and when to evaluate EpCAM expression in patients with cancer.Material and methodsEpCAM expression was assessed by a well-established immunohistochemical staining protocol in 2291 primary tumour tissues and in 108 metastases using the EpCAM-specific antibody clone VU1D9. A total immunostaining score was calculated as the product of a proportion score and an intensity score. Four expression subgroups (no, weak, moderate and intense) were defined. As described previously, the term ‘EpCAM overexpression’ was reserved for tissues showing a total immunostaining score >4.ResultsEpCAM was highly expressed in most tumours of gastrointestinal origin and in some carcinomas of the genitourinary tract. However, hepatocellular carcinomas, clear cell renal cell cancer, urothelial cancer and squamous cell cancers were frequently EpCAM negative. EpCAM expression in breast cancer depended on the histological subtype; lobular histology usually showed no or weak expression. Most metastases were EpCAM positive and they frequently reflected the expression phenotype of the primary tumour.ConclusionEpCAM expression was detected on adenocarcinomas of various primary sites. If EpCAM-specific antibodies are intended to be used in patients with cancer, we recommend prior immunohistochemical evaluation of EpCAM expression, particularly in patients with renal cell cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, breast cancer and squamous cell carcinomas.

Adjuvant systemic therapy (a strategy that targets potential disseminated tumor cells after complete removal of the tumor) has clearly improved survival of patients with cancer. To date, no tool is available to monitor efficacy of these therapies, unless distant metastases arise, a situation that unavoidably leads to death. We analyzed RASSF1A DNA methylation in pretherapeutic sera and serum samples collected 1 year after surgery from 148 patients with breast cancer who were receiving adjuvant tamoxifen; 19.6% and 22.3% of patients with breast cancer showed RASSF1A DNA methylation in their pretherapeutic and 1-year-after serum samples, respectively. RASSF1A methylation 1 year after primary surgery (and during adjuvant tamoxifen therapy) was an independent predictor of poor outcome, with a relative risk (95% confidence interval) for relapse of 5.1 (1.3-19.8) and for death of 6.9 (1.9-25.9). Measurement of serum DNA methylation allows adjuvant systemic treatment to be monitored for efficacy: disappearance of RASSF1A DNA methylation in serum throughout treatment with tamoxifen indicates a response, whereas persistence or new appearance means resistance to adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. It remains to be seen whether modifications made in adjuvant therapeutic strategies based on detection of circulating nucleic acids will improve survival as well as quality of life.

No abstract

To conclude, this study suggests that immunosuppressive therapy in infl-CMP patients results in an improved heart transplantation-free survival as compared with standard heart failure therapy alone, underscoring the urgent need for a large prospective multicenter trial.