No abstract

Background:The neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has prognostic value in patients with a variety of cancers. Many chemotherapeutic trial databases hold information on white cell and neutrophil counts only. The aim of the present study was to compare the prognostic value of the NLR with a derived score (dNLR), composed of white cell and neutrophil counts.Methods:Patients (n=27 031) who were sampled incidentally between 2000 and 2007 for neutrophil, lymphocyte and white cell counts, and also had a diagnosis of cancer (Scottish Cancer Registry), were identified. Of this group, 12 118 patients who had been sampled within 2 years of their cancer diagnosis were studied.Results:On follow-up, there were 7366 deaths, of which 6198 (84%) were cancer deaths. The median time from blood sampling to diagnosis was 2.1 months. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for cancer-specific survival was 0.650 for the NLR and 0.640 for the dNLR. The NLR and dNLR were independently associated with survival in all cancers studied (all P<0.001). The optimal thresholds, on the basis of hazard ratios and area under the curve, were 4 : 1 for the NLR and 2 : 1 for the dNLR.Conclusion:The results of the present study show that the dNLR has similar prognostic value to the NLR. Therefore, the universally available dNLR is to be commended for use in the risk stratification of patients undergoing chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), an inflammation‐based prognostic score that uses thresholds of C‐reactive protein (> 10 mg/L) and albumin (< 35 g/L), has been found to be independently prognostic of survival in patients with cancer. The objective of the current study was to establish whether the addition of a differential leukocyte count and a high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein measurement enhanced the prognostic value of the mGPS. METHODS A total of 12,119 patients who had an incidental blood sample taken between 2000 and 2007 for C‐reactive protein, albumin, and a differential leukocyte count as well as a diagnosis of cancer made within 2 years were identified. This group was studied for the prognostic value of neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet counts. In addition 2742 patients whose blood was sampled after the introduction of high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein measurements were studied for the prognostic value of different thresholds. RESULTS Using cancer‐specific survival as an endpoint, the prognostic value of the mGPS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.61; P < .001 [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), 0.695]) was found to be improved by the addition of neutrophil and platelet counts (HR, 4.86; P < .001 [AUC, 0.734]) and a high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein measurement (> 3 mg/L) (HR, 5.77; P < .001 [AUC, 0.734]). CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study demonstrate that the addition of neutrophil and platelet counts, as well as a high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein measurement, enhanced the prognostic value of the mGPS. Cancer 2013;119:2325–2332. © 2013 American Cancer Society.

IntroductionMarkers of the systemic inflammatory response, including C-reactive protein and albumin (combined to form the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score), as well as neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet counts have been shown to be prognostic of survival in patients with cancer. The aim of the present study was to examine the prognostic relationship between these markers of the systemic inflammatory response and all-cause, cancer, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular mortality in a large incidentally sampled cohort.MethodsPatients (n = 160 481) who had an incidental blood sample taken between 2000 and 2008 were studied for the prognostic value of C-reactive protein (>10mg/l, albumin (>35mg/l), neutrophil (>7.5×109/l) lymphocyte and platelet counts. Also, patients (n = 52 091) sampled following the introduction of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (>3mg/l) measurements were studied. A combination of these markers, to make cumulative inflammation-based scores, were investigated.ResultsIn all patients (n = 160 481) C-reactive protein (>10mg/l) (HR 2.71, p<0.001), albumin (>35mg/l) (HR 3.68, p<0.001) and neutrophil counts (HR 2.18, p<0.001) were independently predictive of all-cause mortality. These associations were also observed in cancer, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular mortality before and after the introduction of high sensitivity C-reactive protein measurements (>3mg/l) (n = 52 091). A combination of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (>3mg/l), albumin and neutrophil count predicted all-cause (HR 7.37, p<0.001, AUC 0.723), cancer (HR 9.32, p<0.001, AUC 0.731), cardiovascular (HR 4.03, p<0.001, AUC 0.650) and cerebrovascular (HR 3.10, p<0.001, AUC 0.623) mortality.ConclusionThe results of the present study showed that an inflammation-based prognostic score, combining high sensitivity C-reactive protein, albumin and neutrophil count is prognostic of all-cause mortality.

Near-maximal efficiency of reflex testing can be achieved, depending on the reflex and diagnostic thresholds applied. Reflective and reflex testing are complementary activities, the clinical utility of which depends on the initiators used.