The AVAglio (Avastin in Glioblastoma) and RTOG-0825 randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trials in newly diagnosed glioblastoma reported prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), with the addition of bevacizumab to radiotherapy plus temozolomide. To establish whether certain patient subgroups derived an OS benefit from the addition of bevacizumab to first-line standard-of-care therapy, AVAglio patients were retrospectively evaluated for molecular subtype, and bevacizumab efficacy was assessed for each patient subgroup.
Patients and MethodsA total of 349 pretreatment specimens (bevacizumab arm, n 5 171; placebo arm, n 5 178) from AVAglio patients (total, N 5 921) were available for biomarker analysis. Samples were profiled for gene expression and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation status and classified into previously identified molecular subtypes. PFS and OS were assessed within each subtype.
ResultsA multivariable analysis accounting for prognostic covariates revealed that bevacizumab conferred a significant OS advantage versus placebo for patients with proneural IDH1 wild-type tumors (17.1 v 12.8 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.73; P 5 .002). This analysis also revealed an interaction between the proneural subtype biomarker and treatment arm (P 5 .023). The group of patients with mesenchymal and proneural tumors derived a PFS benefit from bevacizumab compared with placebo; however, this translated to an OS benefit in the proneural subset only.
ConclusionRetrospective analysis of AVAglio data suggests that patients with IDH1 wild-type proneural glioblastoma may derive an OS benefit from first-line bevacizumab treatment. The predictive value of the proneural subtype observed in AVAglio should be validated in an independent data set.
Purpose: GDC-0973 is a potent and selective mitogen-activated protein (MAP)/extracellular signalregulated kinase (ERK) kinase (MEK) inhibitor. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling was used to relate GDC-0973 plasma and tumor concentrations, tumor pharmacodynamics and antitumor efficacy to establish pharmacokinetic endpoints and predict active doses in the clinic.Experimental Design: A PK-PD model was used to characterize GDC-0973 tumor disposition and in vivo potency in WM-266-4 xenograft mice. Simulations were conducted using the PK-PD model along with human pharmacokinetics to identify a target plasma concentration and predict active doses. In vivo potency and antitumor efficacy were characterized in A375 melanoma xenograft mice, and a population-based integrated PK-PD-efficacy model was used to relate tumor pharmacodynamics (%pERK decrease) to antitumor activity.Results: GDC-0973 showed a sustained tumor pharmacodynamic response due to longer residence in tumor than in plasma. Following single doses of GDC-0973, estimated in vivo IC 50 values of %pERK decrease based on tumor concentrations in xenograft mice were 0.78 (WM-266-4) and 0.52 mmol/L (A375). Following multiple doses of GDC-0973, the estimated in vivo IC 50 value in WM-266-4 increased (3.89 mmol/L). Human simulations predicted a minimum target plasma concentration of 83 nmol/L and an active dose range of 28 to 112 mg. The steep relationship between tumor pharmacodynamics (%pERK decrease) and antitumor efficacy suggests a pathway modulation threshold beyond which antitumor efficacy switches on.Conclusions: Clinical observations of %pERK decrease and antitumor activity were consistent with model predictions. This article illustrates how PK-PD modeling can improve the translation of preclinical data to humans by providing a means to integrate preclinical and early clinical data.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.