Background Breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) allows for assessing tumor sensitivity to systemic treatment, planning adjuvant treatment and follow-up. However, a sufficiently large number of patients fail to achieve the desired level of pathological tumor response while optimal early response assessment methods have not been established now. In our study, we simultaneously assessed the early chemotherapy-induced changes in the tumor volume by ultrasound (US), the tumor oxygenation by diffuse optical spectroscopy imaging (DOSI), and the state of the tumor vascular bed by Doppler US to elaborate the predictive criteria of breast tumor response to treatment. Methods A total of 133 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of invasive breast cancer stage II to III admitted to NACT following definitive breast surgery were enrolled, of those 103 were included in the final analysis. Tumor oxygenation by DOSI, tumor volume by US, and tumor vascularization by Doppler US were determined before the first and second cycle of NACT. After NACT completion, patients underwent surgery followed by pathological examination and assessment of the pathological tumor response. On the basis of these, data regression predictive models were created. Results We observed changes in all three parameters 3 weeks after the start of the treatment. However, a high predictive potential for early assessment of tumor sensitivity to NACT demonstrated only the level of oxygenation, ΔStO2, (ρ = 0.802, p ≤ 0.01). The regression model predicts the tumor response with a high probability of a correct conclusion (89.3%). The “Tumor volume” model and the “Vascularization index” model did not accurately predict the absence of a pathological tumor response to treatment (60.9% and 58.7%, respectively), while predicting a positive response to treatment was relatively better (78.9% and 75.4%, respectively). Conclusions Diffuse optical spectroscopy imaging appeared to be a robust tool for early predicting breast cancer response to chemotherapy. It may help identify patients who need additional molecular genetic study of the tumor in order to find the source of resistance to treatment, as well as to correct the treatment regimen.
There is a wide range of equivocal melanocytic lesions that can be clinically and dermoscopically indistinguishable from early melanoma. In the present work, we assessed the possibilities of combined using of multiphoton microscopy (MPM) and optical coherence angiography (OCA) for differential diagnosis of the equivocal melanocytic lesions. Clinical and dermoscopic examinations of 60 melanocytic lesions revealed 10 benign lesions and 32 melanomas, while 18 lesions remained difficult to diagnose. Histopathological analysis of these lesions revealed 4 intradermal, 3 compound and 3 junctional nevi in the “benign” group, 7 superficial spreading, 14 lentigo maligna and 11 nodular melanomas in the “melanoma” group and 2 lentigo simplex, 4 dysplastic nevi, 6 melanomas in situ, 4 invasive lentigo melanomas and 2 invasive superficial spreading melanomas in the “equivocal” group. On the basis of MPM, a multiphoton microscopy score (MPMS) has been developed for quantitative assessment of melanoma features at the cellular level, that showed lower score for benign lesions compare with malignant ones. OCA revealed that the invasive melanoma has a higher vessel density and thicker blood vessels than melanoma in situ and benign lesions. Discriminant functions analysis of MPM and OCA data allowed to differentiate correctly between all equivocal melanocytic lesions. Therefore, we demonstrate, for the first time, that a combined use of MPM and OCA has the potential to improve early diagnosis of melanoma.
Background Breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) allows assessing tumor sensitivity to systemic treatment, planning adjuvant treatment and follow-up. However, a sufficiently large number of patients fail to achieve the desired level of pathological tumor response while optimal early response assessment methods have not been established now. In our study, we simultaneously assessed the early chemotherapy-induced changes in the tumor volume by Ultrasound (US), the tumor oxygenation by Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy Imaging (DOSI) and the state of the tumor vascular bed by Doppler US to elaborate the predictive criteria of breast tumor response to treatment. Methods A total of 133 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of invasive breast cancer stage II to III admitted to NACT with following definitive breast surgery were enrolled, 108 of them completed the therapy. Tumor oxygenation by DOSI, tumor volume by US and tumor vascularization by Doppler US were determined before the first and before the second cycle of NACT. After NACT completion, patients underwent surgery followed by pathological examination and assessment of the pathological tumor response. On the basis of these data regression predictive models were created. Results We observed changes in all three parameters at the early time after the start of the treatment. However, a high predictive potential for early assessment of tumor sensitivity to NACT demonstrated only the level of oxygenation, ΔStO2, (ρ = 0,802, р≤0,01). The regression model predicts the tumor response with a high probability of a correct conclusion (89,3%). The “Tumor volume” model and the “Vascularization index” model did not accurately predict the absence of a pathological tumor response to treatment (60.9% and 58.7%, respectively), while predicting a positive response to treatment was relatively better (70.9% and 75.4%, respectively). Conclusions Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy Imaging appeared to be a robust tool for early predicting breast cancer response to chemotherapy. It may help identifying patients who need additional molecular genetic study of the tumor in order to find the source of resistance to treatment, as well as to correct the treatment regimen.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.