BackgroundThe Registry of Adult and Paediatric Patients Treated with Cystadane® – Homocystinuria (RoCH) is a non-interventional, observational, multi-centre, post-authorization safety study that aimed to identify safety of betaine anhydrous (Cystadane®) in the treatment of patients with inborn errors of homocysteine metabolism (homocystinuria) in order to minimise the treatment associated risks and establish better knowledge on its clinical use. The registry included patients of all ages with homocystinuria who were treated with betaine anhydrous in conjunction with other therapies. Clinical data were collected retrospectively from 2007 to 2013, then prospectively up to February 2014. All adverse events (AEs) reported during the study were recorded. The clinical and biological status of patients was monitored at least once a year.ResultsA total of 125 patients with homocystinuria (adults [> 18 years]: 50; paediatric [≤18 years]: 75) were enrolled at 29 centres in France and Spain. Patients were treated with betaine anhydrous for a mean duration of 7.4 ± 4.3 years. The median total daily dose of betaine anhydrous at the first and last study visits was 6 g/day for cystathionine β-synthase (CBS)-deficient vitamin B6 responders and 9 g/day for methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase-deficient patients, while the median daily dose increased in CBS-deficient B6 non-responders (from 6 to 9 g/day) and cobalamin metabolism-defective patients (from 3 to 6 g/day) between the first and last visits. Treatment caused a mean overall reduction of 29% in plasma homocysteine levels in the study population. A total of 277 AEs were reported during the study, of which two non-serious AEs (bad taste and headache) and one serious AE (interstitial lung disease) were considered to be drug related. Overall, betaine anhydrous was well tolerated with no major safety concerns.ConclusionsData from the RoCH registry provided real-world evidence on the clinical safety and efficacy of betaine anhydrous in the management of homocystinuria in paediatric and adult patients.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-019-1036-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Objective—
We aimed to study the association among ABO blood group, von Willebrand factor, factor VIII plasma levels, and the risk of venous thrombosis (VT) in a cohort of 1774 relatives from 500 families with inherited thrombophilia.
Methods and Results—
One hundred sixty-one of the 1774 relatives had a VT. Different risk groups were formed: no, low-(factor V Leiden or F2G20210A heterozygous carriers), and high-risk thrombophilia (antithrombin, protein C, protein S, factor V Leiden, or F2G20210A homozygous carriers and combined defects). Compared with group O, AB blood group was associated with increased risk of VT: hazard ratio (HR)=3.8 (2.0–7.2). The effect of blood group A and B was milder (HR=1.6 [1.1–2.5] and 1.8 [1.0–3.3], respectively). An increased risk of VT was observed with increasing levels of von Willebrand factor and factor VIII plasma levels (HR=2.96 [1.92–4.56] and HR=2.60 [1.92–4.56] for third versus first tertile of von Willebrand factor and factor VIII plasma levels, respectively). In multivariate analysis, AB group (HR=2.3 [1.1–4.8]), high-risk thrombophilia (HR=2.8 [1.6–4.6]), and high von Willebrand factor levels (HR=2.3 [1.3–4.0]) were significantly associated with increased risk of VT. The risk of VT in individuals with high-risk thrombophilia and AB group was 14.4× higher than in those without thrombophilia and O group (5.0–41.4).
Conclusion—
ABO blood group modifies the risk of VT in families with hereditary thrombophilia. Phenotyping of the ABO blood group should be performed to better assess the risk of VT in asymptomatic individuals from thrombophilic families.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.